7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2010Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333-34 , 96 S. Ct. 893 , 47 L. 2010Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333-34 , 96 S. Ct. 893 , 47 L. | 4 | 2009–2010 |
Foucha v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2010He argues it allows the State to confine him without proving his paraphilia beyond a reasonable doubt because it deprives him of a meaningful opportunity for a hearing. ¶29 When the original basis for commitment no longer exists, a committed person is “entitled to constitutionally adequate procedures to establish the grounds for his confinement.” Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 79 , 112 S. Ct. 1780 , 118 L. 2010He argues it allows the State to confine him without proving his paraphilia beyond a reasonable doubt because it deprives him of a meaningful opportunity for a hearing. ¶29 When the original basis for commitment no longer exists, a committed person is “entitled to constitutionally adequate procedures to establish the grounds for his confinement.” Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 79 , 112 S. Ct. 1780 , 118 L. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
In re the Detention of Fox
green
2 sentences2010But in In re Detention of Fox, 138 Wash.App. 374, 398-400 , 158 P.3d 69 (2007), we determined that former RCW 71.09.090(4) did not violate due process because it did not prevent the petitioners from introducing actuarial or clinical data as evidence; instead, it prevented a finding of probable cause based solely on such evidence demonstrating a change in a single demographic factor. ¶ 32 Likewise, here the statute does not prevent McGary from introducing evidence of an erroneous paraphilia diagnosis at a show cause hearing; it only prevents a finding of probable cause based solely on evidence 2010But in In re Detention of Fox, 138 Wn. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
2 sentences2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wash.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). 2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
2 sentences2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wash.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). 2006City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence2021Ed. 2d 297 (1973), and State v. Jones, 168 Wn.2d 713, 720 , 230 P.3d 576 (2010), Ennis also characterizes the giving of the corroboration instruction as violating his due process right to a meaningful opportunity for his defense to be heard. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Chambers v. Mississippi
green
1 sentence2021Despite the breadth of Chambers’s reference to a “right to a fair opportunity to defend against the State’s accusations,” 410 U.S. at 294 , the right to present a defense is not implicated by anything happening at trial that a defendant later contends was unfair. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Ramos
green
1 sentence2021Ed. 2d 297 (1973), and State v. Jones, 168 Wn.2d 713, 720 , 230 P.3d 576 (2010), Ennis also characterizes the giving of the corroboration instruction as violating his due process right to a meaningful opportunity for his defense to be heard. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Fox v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
green
1 sentence2010But in In re Detention of Fox, 138 Wash.App. 374, 398-400 , 158 P.3d 69 (2007), we determined that former RCW 71.09.090(4) did not violate due process because it did not prevent the petitioners from introducing actuarial or clinical data as evidence; instead, it prevented a finding of probable cause based solely on such evidence demonstrating a change in a single demographic factor. ¶ 32 Likewise, here the statute does not prevent McGary from introducing evidence of an erroneous paraphilia diagnosis at a show cause hearing; it only prevents a finding of probable cause based solely on evidence | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.