essence of the standing inquiry (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

essence of the standing inquiry in Wisconsin

7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Bence v. City of Milwaukeegreen
wis · 1982 · cited in 2 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1990–2008
2 sentences

2008See Bence v. City of Milwaukee, 107 Wis. 2d 469, 479 , 320 N.W.2d 199 (1982).

2008See Bence v. City of Milwaukee, 107 Wis. 2d 469, 479 , 320 N.W.2d 199 (1982).

22
Baker v. Carrgreen
scotus · 1962 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982Study Group, Inc., 438 U.S. 59, 72 (1978), the United States Supreme Court discussed the question of standing to sue as follows: *479 “The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the parties seeking to invoke the court’s jurisdiction have ‘alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions.’ Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204 (1962).

11
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.green
scotus · 1978 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982Study Group, Inc., 438 U.S. 59, 72 (1978), the United States Supreme Court discussed the question of standing to sue as follows: *479 “The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the parties seeking to invoke the court’s jurisdiction have ‘alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions.’ Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204 (1962).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mills green
wisctapp · 1987
2 sentences

2021“A person may not appeal from a judgment unless he or she is aggrieved by it.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mills, 142 Wis. 2d 215, 217 , 418 N.W.2d 14 (Ct. App.1987).

2021“A person may not appeal from a judgment unless he or she is aggrieved by it.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mills, 142 Wis. 2d 215, 217 , 418 N.W.2d 14 (Ct. App.1987).

22008–2021
Kiser v. Jungbacker green
wisctapp · 2008
2 sentences

2021Preston also pointed out, and the circuit court ultimately determined, and the Association’s counsel agreed, that the Declaration does not authorize attorney fees in this small claims action for a money judgment. 6 No. 2020AP1860 because I conclude that Preston lacks standing to appeal and, therefore, this appeal must be dismissed. ¶14 “The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the party seeking review has alleged a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.” Kiser v. Jungbacker, 2008 WI App 88, ¶12 , 312 Wis. 2d 621 , 754 N.W.2d 180 .

2021Preston also pointed out, and the circuit court ultimately determined, and the Association’s counsel agreed, that the Declaration does not authorize attorney fees in this small claims action for a money judgment. 6 No. 2020AP1860 because I conclude that Preston lacks standing to appeal and, therefore, this appeal must be dismissed. ¶14 “The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the party seeking review has alleged a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.” Kiser v. Jungbacker, 2008 WI App 88, ¶12 , 312 Wis. 2d 621 , 754 N.W.2d 180 .

22008–2021
State v. Milashoski green
wisctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2007"The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the parties seeking to invoke the court's jurisdiction have alleged a personal stake in the outcome which is at once related to a distinct and palpable injury and a fairly traceable causal connection between the claimed injury and the *210 challenged conduct." State v. Milashoski, 159 Wis. 2d 99, 107 , 464 N.W.2d 21 (Ct. App. 1990) (citations omitted).

2007"The essence of the standing inquiry is whether the parties seeking to invoke the court's jurisdiction have alleged a personal stake in the outcome which is at once related to a distinct and palpable injury and a fairly traceable causal connection between the claimed injury and the *210 challenged conduct." State v. Milashoski, 159 Wis. 2d 99, 107 , 464 N.W.2d 21 (Ct. App. 1990) (citations omitted).

12007–2007
State v. Milashoski green
wis · 1991
2 sentences

1994Id.

1994Id. [14] George has done so.

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

IL 12 (1993–2013) ID 8 (1993–2023) WI 7 (1982–2021) VA 6 (1984–2020) OH 3 (2005–2008) CA 3 (2004–2023) PA 2 (1984–1992) HI 2 (1981–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check