6 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1975–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ferrell v. Baxtergreen2 sentences1992Ferrell, 484 P.2d at 263-64 . 1976Similarly, if jury issues are determined to exist as to either, or both, of these issues, then it becomes the jury's task, under appropriate instructions, to resolve such factual issues. [13] Subsequent to the accident in this case, the legislature reaffirmed that the employer's statutory duties extended to compliance with the Code, by amending AS 18.60.075(a) to read in part: An employer shall do everything necessary to protect the life, health and safety of employees including: (1) complying with all occupational safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by the department... . | 2 | 3 |
Breitkreutz v. Bakergreen2 sentences1976Similarly, if jury issues are determined to exist as to either, or both, of these issues, then it becomes the jury's task, under appropriate instructions, to resolve such factual issues. [13] Subsequent to the accident in this case, the legislature reaffirmed that the employer's statutory duties extended to compliance with the Code, by amending AS 18.60.075(a) to read in part: An employer shall do everything necessary to protect the life, health and safety of employees including: (1) complying with all occupational safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by the department... . 1976See e. g., Beithreutz v. Baker, 514 P.2d 17, 20 (Alaska 1973). 24 . | 1 | 2 |
Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield Companygreen1 sentence1981Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 541 P.2d 717, 724 (Alaska 1975), quoting Ahlstrom v. Cummings, 388 P.2d 261, 262 (Alaska 1964). | 1 | 1 |
Ahlstrom v. Cummingsgreen1 sentence1981Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 541 P.2d 717, 724 (Alaska 1975), quoting Ahlstrom v. Cummings, 388 P.2d 261, 262 (Alaska 1964). | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Dubielgreen2 sentences1976See also Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 (Alaska 1962). . 1976Restatement (Second) of Torts § 288B (1965) provides: (1) The unexcused violation of a legislative enactment or an administrative regulation which is adopted by the court as defining the standard of conduct of a reasonable man, is negligence in itself. (2) The unexcused violation of an enactment or regulation which is not so adopted may be relevant evidence bearing on the issue of negligent conduct. [7] See also Rogers v. Dubiel, 373 P.2d 295 (Alaska 1962). [8] Eisenhuth v. Moneyhon, 161 Ohio St. 367 , 119 N.E.2d 440 (1954). [9] We are left to speculate as to the nature of those design defects | 1 | 1 |
Meyst v. East Fifth Avenue Service, Inc.green1 sentence1976Serv., Inc., 401 P.2d 430, 435-36 (Alaska 1965)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.