6 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1951–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lawrence County v. Townsendgreen2 sentences1989See Lawrence County v. Townsend, 202 Ark. 887 , 154 S.W.2d 4 (1941). 1989See Lawrence County v. Townsend, 202 Ark. 887 , 154 S.W.2d 4 (1941). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chavers v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences2008Chavers, 349 Ark. at 559-60 , 79 S.W.3d at 367-68 . 2008Chavers, 349 Ark. at 559-60 , 79 S.W.3d at 367-68 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co.
green
1 sentence2002In Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co., 994 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir. 1993), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in reviewing a grant of summary judgment, affirmed the district court and held that if the issue was presented to us, the Arkansas Supreme Court would adopt the “frequency, regularity, and proximity” test in determining whether proximate cause had been proven in toxic-tort cases. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Jones v. City of Birmingham
neutral
1 sentence1973In the similar Alabama case of Jones v. City of Birmingham, 224 So. 2d 922 , the Alabama Court of Appeals said: “The instant exposure of mammary prowess and endowment —while undoubtedly not within the de minimis rule — to be given First (and Fourteenth) Amendment protection must have been more than mere conduct.” We conclude, therefore, from the record before us, that the acts involved in the case at bar had nothing to do with the “exercise of freedom of expression,” but consisted entirely of the conduct of appearing in a public place naked or partly so with the intent of making a public exhib | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Brown v. Land, Inc.
green
2 sentences1967In a case markedly similar to this one, Brown v. Land, Inc. 236 Ark. 15 , 364 S. W. 2d 659 (1963), which turned upon the existence of bnffer zones between subdivisions, we adhered to our earlier cases rejecting the de minimis principle with respect to the ownership of land. 1967In a case markedly similar to this one, Brown v. Land, Inc. 236 Ark. 15 , 364 S. W. 2d 659 (1963), which turned upon the existence of bnffer zones between subdivisions, we adhered to our earlier cases rejecting the de minimis principle with respect to the ownership of land. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Reeves v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1951In Reeves v. Jackson, 207 Ark. 1089 , 184 S. W. 2d 256 , there is the statement that the doctrine of de minimis does not apply to the invasion of the property of another, citing 26 R. 1951In Reeves v. Jackson, 207 Ark. 1089 , 184 S. W. 2d 256 , there is the statement that the doctrine of de minimis does not apply to the invasion of the property of another, citing 26 R. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.