fiscal analysis in California

2018(See, e.g., Valencia , supra , 3 Cal.5th at p. 365 , 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 230 , 397 P.3d 936 .) Moreover, the Legislative Analyst's fiscal analysis regarding the loss of fine and penalty revenues is consistent with the statutory restitution scheme, which now prioritizes victim restitution orders above restitution fines .

2018(See, e.g., Valencia , supra , 3 Cal.5th at p. 365 , 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 230 , 397 P.3d 936 .) Moreover, the Legislative Analyst's fiscal analysis regarding the loss of fine and penalty revenues is consistent with the statutory restitution scheme, which now prioritizes victim restitution orders above restitution fines .

2018(See, e.g., § 2085.5, subd. (j) ["If a prisoner has both a restitution fine and a restitution order from the sentencing court, the department shall collect the restitution order first ...."]; § 2085.5, subds. (k), ( l ) [designated local agencies collect restitution orders before fines]; § 1203.1d, subd. (b) [restitution victims have first priority for disbursement of restitution funds collected by the FTB at the request of a designated local agency].) Finally, Joya's interpretation of the measure would, as Administrator contends, lead to "strange consequences." (See Valencia , supra , 3 Cal.5

2018(See, e.g., § 2085.5, subd. (j) ["If a prisoner has both a restitution fine and a restitution order from the sentencing court, the department shall collect the restitution order first ...."]; § 2085.5, subds. (k), ( l ) [designated local agencies collect restitution orders before fines]; § 1203.1d, subd. (b) [restitution victims have first priority for disbursement of restitution funds collected by the FTB at the request of a designated local agency].) Finally, Joya's interpretation of the measure would, as Administrator contends, lead to "strange consequences." (See Valencia , supra , 3 Cal.5

2025(Cf. Sweeney, at p. 1115 [inferring compliance where the record showed that the “Regional Board was aware of the requirement that the burden of reports be proportional to their anticipated 14 benefit”]; see Rancho Cucamonga, supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at p. 1386 [inferring compliance with section 13241’s requirement that “economic factors” be considered where the record showed that the permit “was based on a fiscal analysis and a cost-benefit analysis”].) Echoing the trial court’s ruling, the Regional Board urges that section 13267(b) does not apply to the dual permit in this case.

2012The retroactive part of the agreement may be enforced only if it and its fiscal consequences are explicitly submitted to, and approved by vote of, the Legislature.” (CSLEA, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at pp. 5-6.) The arbitrator in CSLEA had found a fiscal analysis presented to the Legislature “ ‘expressly noted the possibility’ ” of retroactivity.

2012“Because Senate Bill 183 and the materials provided to the Legislature regarding the bill did not state that the reclassification would be applied retroactively and did not contain a fiscal analysis of the cost of the retroactive application of safety member status for all employees in Unit 7, we must vacate that portion of the arbitration award as violating the public policy embodied in the Dills Act.” (CSLEA, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at p. 19, fn. omitted.) Here, in the instant case, the Union correctly states that the Legislature was advised the Plata order “could potentially impact” the cost

1981(Anton v. San Antonio Community Hosp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 802, 820 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 442 , 567 P.2d 1162 ].) 4 Accordingto section 3502, the Attorney General’s title and summary “shall not exceed a total of 100 words.” 5 Section 3572 of the Elections Code and section 88003 of the Government Code are identical; they provide: “The Legislative Analyst shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure describing the measure and including a fiscal analysis of the measure showing the amount of any increase or decrease in revenue or cost to state or local government.

1981(Anton v. San Antonio Community Hosp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 802, 820 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 442 , 567 P.2d 1162 ].) 4 Accordingto section 3502, the Attorney General’s title and summary “shall not exceed a total of 100 words.” 5 Section 3572 of the Elections Code and section 88003 of the Government Code are identical; they provide: “The Legislative Analyst shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure describing the measure and including a fiscal analysis of the measure showing the amount of any increase or decrease in revenue or cost to state or local government.