optional de novo hearing (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

optional de novo hearing in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Nardini green
conn · 1982
2 sentences

2019It thus gives him an optional de novo hearing as to the punishment to be imposed.’’ (Citations omitted; emphasis added.) State v. Nardini, 187 Conn. 109 , 121–22, 445 A.2d 304 (1982); General Statutes § 51-194 et seq.

2019It thus gives him an optional de novo hearing as to the punishment to be imposed.’’ (Citations omitted; emphasis added.) State v. Nardini, 187 Conn. 109 , 121–22, 445 A.2d 304 (1982); General Statutes § 51-194 et seq.

31997–2019
James L. v. Commissioner of Correction green
conn · 1998
2 sentences

2007It thus gives him [or her] an optional de novo hearing as to the punishment to be imposed.” 3 (Internal quotation *30 marks omitted.) James L. v. Commissioner of Correction, 245 Conn. 132, 144 , 712 A.2d 947 (1998).

2007It thus gives him [or her] an optional de novo hearing as to the punishment to be imposed.” 3 (Internal quotation *30 marks omitted.) James L. v. Commissioner of Correction, 245 Conn. 132, 144 , 712 A.2d 947 (1998).

22006–2007
Consiglio v. Warden green
conn · 1966
2 sentences

1998Under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution and the sixth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution, the petitioner had a right to the effective assistance of counsel with respect to access to sentence review. “[T]he sentencing process is a critical stage of a criminal trial.” Consiglio v. Warden, 153 Conn. 673, 676 , 220 A.2d 269 (1966).

1998Under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution and the sixth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution, the petitioner had a right to the effective assistance of counsel with respect to access to sentence review. “[T]he sentencing process is a critical stage of a criminal trial.” Consiglio v. Warden, 153 Conn. 673, 676 , 220 A.2d 269 (1966).

21982–1998
State v. Anderson green
conn · 1991
2 sentences

2006Thus, the statute is to be construed liberally in favor of its intended beneficiaries, the prisoners seeking review of their sentences, and any exception from sentence review eligibility is to be construed strictly. ” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Anderson, 220 Conn. 400, 404-405 , 599 A.2d 738 (1991).

2006Thus, the statute is to be construed liberally in favor of its intended beneficiaries, the prisoners seeking review of their sentences, and any exception from sentence review eligibility is to be construed strictly. ” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Anderson, 220 Conn. 400, 404-405 , 599 A.2d 738 (1991).

12006–2006

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-195 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-196 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check