punitive damage claim in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. green conn · 1996 2 sentences 2003Standard "The function of a motion to strike is to test the legal sufficiency of a pleading; it admits all facts well pleaded." Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. , 238 Conn. 216 , 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997). 2003Standard "The function of a motion to strike is to test the legal sufficiency of a pleading; it admits all facts well pleaded." Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. , 238 Conn. 216 , 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).	1	2003–2003
Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2003Standard "The function of a motion to strike is to test the legal sufficiency of a pleading; it admits all facts well pleaded." Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. , 238 Conn. 216 , 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).	1	2003–2003
Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2003Standard "The function of a motion to strike is to test the legal sufficiency of a pleading; it admits all facts well pleaded." Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. , 238 Conn. 216 , 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).	1	2003–2003
Merchants Bank of California, N. A. v. Mardula green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2003Standard "The function of a motion to strike is to test the legal sufficiency of a pleading; it admits all facts well pleaded." Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc. , 238 Conn. 216 , 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).	1	2003–2003
Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp. green conn · 1997 2 sentences 2002In support of their motion to strike the intentional tort claims of the plaintiff, the defendants rely on Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics , 242 Conn. 255 , 698 A.2d 838 (1997), which articulates the standard of proof necessary to support an exception to the Worker's Compensation exclusivity provision for intentional torts. 2002In support of their motion to strike the intentional tort claims of the plaintiff, the defendants rely on Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics , 242 Conn. 255 , 698 A.2d 838 (1997), which articulates the standard of proof necessary to support an exception to the Worker's Compensation exclusivity provision for intentional torts.	1	2002–2002
Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. green connappct · 1986 1 sentence 2002In Edwards v. Novartis Consumer Health et al , Superior Court Complex Litigation Docket, judicial district of Waterbury, Docket No. 167425 (July 15, 2002, McWeeny, J. ), the court, citing Ames v. Sears Roebuck CT Page 14062 Company , supra, 8 Conn. App. 642 , denied a motion by the defendant Arthur Drug Stores to strike the punitive damage claim under facts and argument similar to the motion filed in this case.	1	2002–2002
Lockwood v. Professional Wheelchair Transportation, Inc. green connappct · 1995 1 sentence 1996While the contentions of the plaintiff are well taken, the remand order is consistent with the Appellate Court opinion ( 37 Conn. App. 85 (1995)) in that a new trial is required with respect to the co-defendant, and also, the issue of damages, particularly the punitive damage claim, involves consideration of the claimed wrongful acts of each corporate defendant.	1	1996–1996
Manning v. Michael green conn · 1982 2 sentences 1986A finding of provocation does not justify an assault, but merely limits liability to actual damages sustained.” Manning v. Michael, 188 Conn. 607, 615-16 , 452 A.2d 1157 (1982). 1986A finding of provocation does not justify an assault, but merely limits liability to actual damages sustained.” Manning v. Michael, 188 Conn. 607, 615-16 , 452 A.2d 1157 (1982).	1	1986–1986
Chykirda v. Yanush green conn · 1945 2 sentences 1982Chykirda v. Yanush, 131 Conn. 565, 566 , 41 A.2d 449 (1945). 1982Chykirda v. Yanush, 131 Conn. 565, 566 , 41 A.2d 449 (1945).	1	1982–1982

Where else courts name it

FL 58 (1965–2026) MO 29 (1960–2024) CA 27 (1980–2025) MS 24 (1979–2008) IA 14 (1979–2018) PA 13 (1980–2013) NJ 12 (1979–2021) NY 10 (1977–2020) MD 9 (1991–2009) AZ 9 (1971–2022) NV 7 (1998–2019) TN 6 (1998–2024) IL 6 (1985–2013) VA 6 (1989–2003) CT 6 (1982–2003) RI 6 (2000–2015) KY 5 (1913–2008) SD 5 (1993–2021) IN 5 (1985–2003) OH 4 (1986–2022) WI 4 (1980–2007) WV 4 (1994–2013) MN 4 (1987–1990) MT 3 (2000–2008) ID 3 (1990–2001) AL 3 (1981–2005) GA 3 (1991–2015) AR 3 (1984–2014) NM 3 (1976–2010) LA 2 (1988–1994) NC 2 (1986–1986) OK 2 (1993–1993) DC 2 (1981–1995) TX 2 (1998–2004) CO 2 (2012–2025) KS 2 (1992–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check