6 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burnham v. Administratorgreen1 sentence2019Nonetheless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, supra, 121 Conn. App. 361 ; see also Burnham v. Administrator, Unem- ployment Compensation Act, 184 Conn. 317 , 321–22, 439 A.3d 1008 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Administratorgreen2 sentences2010See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Administrator, 209 Conn. 381, 385 , 551 A.2d 724 (1988). *362 In the present case, the court determined that the combination of the hearsay testimony and the telephone hearing resulted in a violation of due process. 2010See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Administrator, 209 Conn. 381, 385 , 551 A.2d 724 (1988). *362 In the present case, the court determined that the combination of the hearsay testimony and the telephone hearing resulted in a violation of due process. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mendes v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
neutral
1 sentence2022None- theless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mendes v. Administrator, Unemploy- ment Compensation Act, 199 Conn. App. 25 , 29–30, 235 A.3d 665 (2020). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
green
2 sentences2020A plaintiff’s ‘‘failure to file a timely motion for correction of the board’s findings in accordance with [Practice Book] § 22-4 prevents further review of those facts found by the board.’’ JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422 , 828 A.2d 609 (2003). 2020A plaintiff’s ‘‘failure to file a timely motion for correction of the board’s findings in accordance with [Practice Book] § 22-4 prevents further review of those facts found by the board.’’ JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422 , 828 A.2d 609 (2003). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Marquand v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
green
2 sentences2011Nonetheless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Marquand v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 124 Conn. App. 75, 79 , 3 A.3d 172 (2010). 2011Nonetheless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Marquand v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 124 Conn. App. 75, 79 , 3 A.3d 172 (2010). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
green
2 sentences2010Nonetheless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 121 Conn. App. 355, 360-61 , 996 A.2d 280 (2010). 2010Nonetheless, issues of law afford a reviewing court a broader standard of review when compared to a challenge to the factual findings of the referee.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Addona v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 121 Conn. App. 355, 360-61 , 996 A.2d 280 (2010). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.