statute is plain error (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

statute is plain error in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Burkegreen
conn · 1980 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1995–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

24
Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.green
conn · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Ellis green
connappct · 1993
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

2011See, e.g., Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc., 226 Conn. 475 , 480 n.6, 628 A.2d 946 (1993) (“[i]t is plain error for a trial court to fail to apply an applicable statute, even in the absence of the statute having been brought to its attention by the parties”); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980) (“[wjhere the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error”); State v. Ellis, 32 Conn. App. 849, 853 , 632 A.2d 47 (1993) (trial court’s failure to comply with applicable rul

12011–2011
State v. Guckian green
conn · 1993
2 sentences

2008“A trial court commits plain error when it fails to apply a clearly relevant statute to the case before it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Guckian, 27 Conn. App. 225, 246 , 605 A.2d 874 (1992), aff'd, 226 Conn. 191 , 627 A.2d 407 (1993).

2008“A trial court commits plain error when it fails to apply a clearly relevant statute to the case before it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Guckian, 27 Conn. App. 225, 246 , 605 A.2d 874 (1992), aff'd, 226 Conn. 191 , 627 A.2d 407 (1993).

12008–2008
State v. Guckian green
connappct · 1992
2 sentences

2008“A trial court commits plain error when it fails to apply a clearly relevant statute to the case before it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Guckian, 27 Conn. App. 225, 246 , 605 A.2d 874 (1992), aff'd, 226 Conn. 191 , 627 A.2d 407 (1993).

2008“A trial court commits plain error when it fails to apply a clearly relevant statute to the case before it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Guckian, 27 Conn. App. 225, 246 , 605 A.2d 874 (1992), aff'd, 226 Conn. 191 , 627 A.2d 407 (1993).

12008–2008
State v. Hicks green
connappct · 2006
2 sentences

2008“Where the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 271 , 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).

2008“Where the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 271 , 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).

12008–2008
State v. Youngs green
conn · 2006
1 sentence

2008“Where the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 271 , 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).

12008–2008
Pinette v. McLaughlin green
conn · 2006
1 sentence

2008“Where the legislature has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right, failure to follow the mandatory provisions of the statute is plain error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 271 , 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).

12008–2008
State v. Sinclair green
conn · 1985
2 sentences

2001Moreover, our Supreme Court has “regularly characterized as error any but the most minor departure from the language that § 54-84 (b) requires.” State v. Sinclair, 197 Conn. 574, 583 , 500 A.2d 539 (1985).

2001Moreover, our Supreme Court has “regularly characterized as error any but the most minor departure from the language that § 54-84 (b) requires.” State v. Sinclair, 197 Conn. 574, 583 , 500 A.2d 539 (1985).

12001–2001
Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

1980Practice Book, 1978, § 3063; 2 Ha rtford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 (1980). 3 See State v. Hernandez, 154 Conn. 698, 700 , 229 A.2d 30 (1967).

1980Practice Book, 1978, § 3063; 2 Ha rtford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 (1980). 3 See State v. Hernandez, 154 Conn. 698, 700 , 229 A.2d 30 (1967).

11980–1980
State v. Hernandez neutral
conn · 1967
2 sentences

1980Practice Book, 1978, § 3063; 2 Ha rtford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 (1980). 3 See State v. Hernandez, 154 Conn. 698, 700 , 229 A.2d 30 (1967).

1980Practice Book, 1978, § 3063; 2 Ha rtford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 (1980). 3 See State v. Hernandez, 154 Conn. 698, 700 , 229 A.2d 30 (1967).

11980–1980

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check