6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shaw v. Shawgreen1 sentence2022Adhering to the presumptions codified in the Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 2015), the principles advanced in Lazcar International, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), and the adage that we must decline to “substitute [our] judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court,” Goldfarb v. Robertson, 82 So. 2d 504, 506 (Fla. 1955), as this “is not the function of the appellate court,” Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, | 1 | 1 |
Goldfarb v. Robertsongreen1 sentence2022Adhering to the presumptions codified in the Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 2015), the principles advanced in Lazcar International, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), and the adage that we must decline to “substitute [our] judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court,” Goldfarb v. Robertson, 82 So. 2d 504, 506 (Fla. 1955), as this “is not the function of the appellate court,” Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, | 1 | 1 |
Operation Rescue v. Women's Health Centergreen1 sentence2000In Operation Rescue v. Women’s Health Center, Inc., 626 So.2d 664, 670 (Fla.1993), the supreme court set forth the standard for appellate review of injunctions: Where an injunction is issued and challenged, Florida’s appellate courts possess express authority to review the order. | 1 | 1 |
Judge v. Stategreen1 sentence1993See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kozel v. Ostendorf
green
1 sentence2026Ultimately, the trial court analyzed the Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993) factors in a comprehensive order, entering a final default judgment and awarding both damages and attorney’s fees. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
LAZCAR INTERN., INC. v. Caraballo
green
1 sentence2022Adhering to the presumptions codified in the Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 2015), the principles advanced in Lazcar International, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), and the adage that we must decline to “substitute [our] judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court,” Goldfarb v. Robertson, 82 So. 2d 504, 506 (Fla. 1955), as this “is not the function of the appellate court,” Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Lance Koster v. Carol Sullivan
green
1 sentence2022Adhering to the presumptions codified in the Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 2015), the principles advanced in Lazcar International, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), and the adage that we must decline to “substitute [our] judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court,” Goldfarb v. Robertson, 82 So. 2d 504, 506 (Fla. 1955), as this “is not the function of the appellate court,” Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Alvarez v. State
neutral
1 sentence2005The order below, entered after an extensive evidentiary hearing, denied the appellant’s application for relief from a judgment affirmed in Alvarez v. State, 774 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 791 So.2d 1094 (Fla.2001), on grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Gerald Eugene Stano v. Robert A. Butterworth, Harry K. Singletary
green
1 sentence1998Stano v. Butterworth, 51 F.3d 942 (11th Cir.1995). [6] The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on February 20, 1996. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.