6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carratelli v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Carratelli, 961 So. 2d at 322-23 . - 36 - Accordingly, when considering the failure to preserve a challenge to potential jurors in voir dire, the reviewing court should focus on the defendant’s trial, not his appeal. 2017Id. at 323 . | 1 | 2 |
Jenkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2007The test is whether the failure to preserve a challenge to a juror by sufficiently bringing the objection to the trial judge's attention "resulted in a biased juror serving on the jury." Id. at 1260 (quoting Jenkins v. State, 824 So.2d 977, 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)). 2005The test is whether the failure to preserve a challenge to a juror by sufficiently bringing the objection to the trial judge's attention "resulted in a biased juror serving on the jury." Jenkins, 824 So.2d at 982 ; see Goeders v. Hundley, 59 F.3d 73, 75 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is grounded in the claim that counsel failed to strike a biased juror, a defendant "must show that the juror was actually biased against him") Hughes v. United States, 258 F.3d 453, 458 (6th Cir.2001) (citing Goeders ). | 1 | 2 |
Schwab v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Appellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise an issue that was not pursued or objected to at trial.”); see also Parker v. Dugger, 550 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla. 1989) (“[H]abeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been . . . or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial.”). - 28 - by counsel and the habeas claim concerned the failure to preserve the claim. 814 So. 2d at 409-14 . | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Duggergreen1 sentence2021Appellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise an issue that was not pursued or objected to at trial.”); see also Parker v. Dugger, 550 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla. 1989) (“[H]abeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been . . . or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial.”). - 28 - by counsel and the habeas claim concerned the failure to preserve the claim. 814 So. 2d at 409-14 . | 1 | 1 |
Palazon v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Neither of these reasons converts improper argument into proper.” Palazon v. State, 711 So.2d 1176, 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (Blue, J., concurring specially). | 1 | 1 |
Kline E. Goeders v. Thomas E. Hundleygreen1 sentence2005The test is whether the failure to preserve a challenge to a juror by sufficiently bringing the objection to the trial judge's attention "resulted in a biased juror serving on the jury." Jenkins, 824 So.2d at 982 ; see Goeders v. Hundley, 59 F.3d 73, 75 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is grounded in the claim that counsel failed to strike a biased juror, a defendant "must show that the juror was actually biased against him") Hughes v. United States, 258 F.3d 453, 458 (6th Cir.2001) (citing Goeders ). | 1 | 1 |
Marshall Dwayne Hughes v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2005The test is whether the failure to preserve a challenge to a juror by sufficiently bringing the objection to the trial judge's attention "resulted in a biased juror serving on the jury." Jenkins, 824 So.2d at 982 ; see Goeders v. Hundley, 59 F.3d 73, 75 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is grounded in the claim that counsel failed to strike a biased juror, a defendant "must show that the juror was actually biased against him") Hughes v. United States, 258 F.3d 453, 458 (6th Cir.2001) (citing Goeders ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carratelli v. State
green
2 sentences2007Both, the court said, "result in an issue not properly presented to the trial court for a ruling." Id. 2007The test is whether the failure to preserve a challenge to a juror by sufficiently bringing the objection to the trial judge's attention "resulted in a biased juror serving on the jury." Id. at 1260 (quoting Jenkins v. State, 824 So.2d 977, 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
green
2 sentences2005The eleventh circuit relied upon Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 , 120 S.Ct. 1029 , 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), to conclude that on postconviction relief, the failure of trial counsel to preserve an objection to a juror should be judged by its effect on the defendant's appeal, and not on the underlying trial. 2005The eleventh circuit relied upon Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 , 120 S.Ct. 1029 , 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), to conclude that on postconviction relief, the failure of trial counsel to preserve an objection to a juror should be judged by its effect on the defendant's appeal, and not on the underlying trial. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.