6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See King v. State, 808 So. 2d 1237 , 1247- 49 (Fla. 2002) (affirming denial of motion for DNA testing when the defendant could not show that the results would raise a reasonable probability of an acquittal or lesser sentence). | 1 | 1 |
Panchu v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See e.g., Panchu v. State, 1 So.3d 1243, 1245-46 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that defendant was entitled to evidentiary hearing where she stated colorable claim in rule 3.170(£) motion that her plea was not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered when she alleged that she received no advice or inadequate advice as to available defenses to her charges); Daniel v. State, 865 So.2d 661, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversing denial of rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea that alleged counsel misadvised him regarding sentencing, and remanding for evidentiary hearing because record failed to | 1 | 1 |
Daniel v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See e.g., Panchu v. State, 1 So.3d 1243, 1245-46 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that defendant was entitled to evidentiary hearing where she stated colorable claim in rule 3.170(£) motion that her plea was not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered when she alleged that she received no advice or inadequate advice as to available defenses to her charges); Daniel v. State, 865 So.2d 661, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversing denial of rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea that alleged counsel misadvised him regarding sentencing, and remanding for evidentiary hearing because record failed to | 1 | 1 |
Cason v. Crosbygreen1 sentence2007See Cason v. Crosby, 892 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Steiner v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Steiner v. State, 604 So.2d 1265, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(ap-pellate court reviews trial court’s probation revocation decision for an abuse of discretion). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Roberts
green
1 sentence2025While we agree with the trial court that the officer’s reason for stopping Howard for speeding is not well-founded based on the lack of specific and articulable facts provided to support a basis for the infraction, see Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. 5 Roberts, 938 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), the officer did have reasonable suspicion to believe that Howard failed to maintain a single lane in violation of section 316.089(1), Florida Statutes (2023). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Glass v. State
green
1 sentence1991The former should have been raised on direct appeal, and the type of sentence complained of in the latter was validated in Glass v. State, 574 So.2d 1099 (Fla.1991). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.