language demands clause (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

language demands clause in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Morgreen
scotus · 1920 · cited in 6 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1995–2018
2 sentences

2018In Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 (1920) (citations omitted), the Supreme Court explained that “[w]hen several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.” The Fourth Circuit applied this canon of statutory construction in Long v. United States, 199 F.2d 717 (4th Cir. 1952).

2010“When several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.” Fortune Ins., 664 So.2d at 316 (quoting Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 , 40 S.Ct. 516 , 64 L.Ed. 944 (1920)).

26

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Long v. United States green
ca4 · 1952
2 sentences

2018In Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 (1920) (citations omitted), the Supreme Court explained that “[w]hen several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.” The Fourth Circuit applied this canon of statutory construction in Long v. United States, 199 F.2d 717 (4th Cir. 1952).

2018In Long, the defendant was convicted of violating a statute that provided: “Whoever forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designed in section 1114 of this title . . . .” Id. at 718 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 111 ).

12018–2018
Fortune Ins. Co. v. Department of Ins. green
fladistctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2010“When several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.” Fortune Ins., 664 So.2d at 316 (quoting Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 , 40 S.Ct. 516 , 64 L.Ed. 944 (1920)).

2010"When several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all." Fortune Ins., 664 So.2d at 316 (quoting Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 , 40 S.Ct. 516 , 64 L.Ed. 944 (1920)).

12010–2010
Nobelman v. American Savings Bank green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

2008Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 330 , 113 S.Ct. 2106 , 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993))); Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 , 40 S.Ct. 516 , 64 L.Ed. 944 (1920) ("When several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.").

2008Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 330 , 113 S.Ct. 2106 , 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993))); Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Mor, 253 U.S. 345, 348 , 40 S.Ct. 516 , 64 L.Ed. 944 (1920) ("When several words are followed by a clause which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the clause be read as applicable to all.").

12008–2008

Where else courts name it

CA 29 (1936–2024) FL 6 (1995–2018) MA 3 (2011–2024) CO 3 (1975–2022) MN 3 (2014–2019) WV 3 (2020–2025) WI 2 (1939–1981) AL 2 (1941–2017) IL 2 (1976–2021) MI 2 (2011–2025) WA 2 (2020–2025) OH 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check