6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Levitt v. Levittgreen1 sentence2022See Levitt v. Levitt, 699 So. 2d 755, 756-57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Where the terms of a marital settlement agreement are clear and unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be gleaned from the four corners of the document.”). 2 1 Former Husband also filed an “Urgent Motion to Permit Temporary Relocation with Minor Child” which mirrored his petition. 2 Affirmed. 2 Former Husband argues that there is an “emergency” exception to the parenting plan’s mediation requirement, and that the trial court erred by not determining whether Former Husband’s employment relocation constituted such an emergency. | 1 | 1 |
Green v. BROWARD GENERAL MEDICAL CTR.green1 sentence1979See, Green v. Broward General Medical Center, 356 So.2d 877 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Mellor v. Arakgui, 359 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Stanton v. Community Hospital of South Broward, 359 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fisher v. Herrera
green
1 sentence1982The case of Herrera v. Doctors’ Hospital, 360 So.2d 1092 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), aff'd. 367 So.2d 204 (Fla.1978), held that neither party could comment on or give reasons for the conclusion reached by the mediation panel. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Herrera v. Doctor's Hospital
green
1 sentence1982The case of Herrera v. Doctors’ Hospital, 360 So.2d 1092 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), aff'd. 367 So.2d 204 (Fla.1978), held that neither party could comment on or give reasons for the conclusion reached by the mediation panel. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Aguilar v. Community General Hospital
neutral
1 sentence1982Recently, in Aguilar v. Community General Hospital, 396 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1981), we again made it clear that where no hearing is begun within six months after the mediation claim was filed, the jurisdiction of the mediation panel terminates after six months. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Diggett v. Conkling
green
1 sentence1981We need not review the decision reached in Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), that the six-month period could not be extended by stipulation, because appellant waived his objection by not contesting the admission of the mediation finding at trial. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Raedel v. Watson Clinic Foundation, Inc.
green
1 sentence1980In Raedel v. Watson Clinic Foundation, Inc., 360 So.2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), the judicial referee approved the parties' stipulation extending the time to commence a mediation hearing beyond six months. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Cole v. Burrows
neutral
1 sentence1980In Cole v. Burrows, 364 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the mediation hearing could not be commenced within ten months due to the untimely demise of the attorney member of the panel. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Mellor v. Arakgui
neutral
1 sentence1979See, Green v. Broward General Medical Center, 356 So.2d 877 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Mellor v. Arakgui, 359 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Stanton v. Community Hospital of South Broward, 359 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Stanton v. COMMUNITY HOSP. OF SOUTH BROWARD
green
1 sentence1979See, Green v. Broward General Medical Center, 356 So.2d 877 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Mellor v. Arakgui, 359 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Stanton v. Community Hospital of South Broward, 359 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.