6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grosvenor v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See § 316.193(3)(c)3., Fla. Stat. (2013) (emphasis added). 13 ‘prejudice’ inquiry will depend largely on whether the affirmative defense likely would have succeeded at trial.”); Grosvenor, 874 So. 2d at 1181 (“The merits of any defense . . . is relevant to the credibility of the defendant’s assertion that he would have insisted on going to trial. 2011“The merits of any defense ... is relevant to the credibility of the defendant’s assertion that he would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. at 1181 ; see also Munroe v. State, 28 So.3d 973, 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“Munroe’s claim of prejudice — that he would have proceeded to trial — is credible if he can demonstrate that the defense was viable.”). | 2 | 3 |
Munroe v. Stategreen2 sentences2011“The merits of any defense ... is relevant to the credibility of the defendant’s assertion that he would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. at 1181 ; see also Munroe v. State, 28 So.3d 973, 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“Munroe’s claim of prejudice — that he would have proceeded to trial — is credible if he can demonstrate that the defense was viable.”). 2011See Grosvenor v. State, 874 So.2d 1176, 1181 (Fla.2004) (“The merits of any defense ... is [sic] relevant to the credibility of the defendant’s assertion that he would have insisted on going to trial.”); Munroe v. State, 28 So.3d 973, 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“Munroe’s claim of prejudice — that he would have proceeded to trial — is credible if he can demonstrate that the defense was viable.”). | 2 | 2 |
Forte v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Forte v. State, 956 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (affirming order striking motion to withdraw plea and noting that the order "shall not be interpreted as an adjudication on the merits of any claim"). | 1 | 1 |
Regan v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); compare Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); compare Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jenkins v. State
green
1 sentence2001See Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); compare Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Sterman v. FLA. ST. UNIVERSITY, ETC.
green
1 sentence1983Sterman v. Florida State University Board of Regents, supra. We express no opinion, of course, regarding the merits of any claim appellant may assert with regard to the right to employment in any capacity. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.