6 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fortunato v. City of Coral Gablesgreen1 sentence2020Petersburg, 76 So. 894 (1917)); see also Fortunato v. City of Coral Gables, 47 So. 2d 321, 322, 323 (Fla. 1950) (holding that plaintiff’s allegations seeking to enjoin the defendant- city from issuing a building permit to the defendant-neighbor to build an apartment that violated the setback requirement were sufficient to require the city and neighbor to answer the complaint and proceed in equity). | 1 | 1 |
Harper v. Stategreen1 sentence2007While standing to participate in chapter 120 proceedings is afforded to those whose “substantial interests” will be affected by the proposed action, standing to seek judicial review is narrower and limited to those who are “adversely affected by final agency action.” See § 120.68(1), Fla. Stat.; O’Connell v. Fla. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs, 874 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Watson v. Buchanangreen1 sentence2004See Watson v. Buchanan, 344 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (holding that setback requirement could be enforced with respect to added swimming pool enclosure); Daniel v. May, 143 So.2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962) (holding that setback was enforceable with regard to carport addition). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Sailsgreen1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hartnett v. Austin
green
2 sentences1972Hartnett v. Austin, Fla. 1956, 93 So.2d 86 ; Josephson v. Autrey, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d 784 . 1971Hartnett v. Austin, Fla.1956, 93 So.2d 86 ; Josephson v. Autrey, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 784 . | 2 | 1971–1972 |
Josephson v. Autrey
green
2 sentences1972Hartnett v. Austin, Fla. 1956, 93 So.2d 86 ; Josephson v. Autrey, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d 784 . 1971Hartnett v. Austin, Fla.1956, 93 So.2d 86 ; Josephson v. Autrey, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 784 . | 2 | 1971–1972 |
Bozeman v. City of St. Petersburg
green
1 sentence2020Petersburg, 76 So. 894 (1917)); see also Fortunato v. City of Coral Gables, 47 So. 2d 321, 322, 323 (Fla. 1950) (holding that plaintiff’s allegations seeking to enjoin the defendant- city from issuing a building permit to the defendant-neighbor to build an apartment that violated the setback requirement were sufficient to require the city and neighbor to answer the complaint and proceed in equity). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Allen v. State
green
1 sentence2020In other words, “once special damages are shown, enforcement of the zoning 7 ordinance is no longer an action purely within the discretion of the state.” Detournay, 127 So. 3d at 880 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Daniel v. May
green
1 sentence2004See Watson v. Buchanan, 344 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (holding that setback requirement could be enforced with respect to added swimming pool enclosure); Daniel v. May, 143 So.2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962) (holding that setback was enforceable with regard to carport addition). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Forde v. City of Miami Beach
green
1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
William Murray Bldrs., Inc. v. City of Jacksonville
green
1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Lawley v. Town of Golfview
green
1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
City of Miami v. Zorovich
green
1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami
neutral
1 sentence1979See Davis v. Sails, 318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 1 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1941); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Lawley v. Town of Golfview, 174 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 271 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); William Murray Builders Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 254 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.