6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spencer v. Allpress Logging, Inc.green2 sentences2022“The case law surrounding the definition of the term ‘employer’ is what the Court refers to as the statutory employer analysis.” Robison v. Bateman- Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 210–11, 76 P.3d 951 , 954–55 (2003). “[T]he concept of [a] statutory employer ‘[is] designed to prevent an employer from avoiding liability under the workmen’s compensation statutes by sub-contracting the work to others.’ ” Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc., 141 Idaho 245, 251 , 108 P.3d 392, 398 (2005) (quoting Spencer v. Allpress Logging, Inc., 134 Idaho 856, 860 , 11 P.3d 475, 479 (2000)). 2022“The case law surrounding the definition of the term ‘employer’ is what the Court refers to as the statutory employer analysis.” Robison v. Bateman- Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 210–11, 76 P.3d 951 , 954–55 (2003). “[T]he concept of [a] statutory employer ‘[is] designed to prevent an employer from avoiding liability under the workmen’s compensation statutes by sub-contracting the work to others.’ ” Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc., 141 Idaho 245, 251 , 108 P.3d 392, 398 (2005) (quoting Spencer v. Allpress Logging, Inc., 134 Idaho 856, 860 , 11 P.3d 475, 479 (2000)). | 2 | 2 |
Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.green2 sentences2022“The case law surrounding the definition of the term ‘employer’ is what the Court refers to as the statutory employer analysis.” Robison v. Bateman- Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 210–11, 76 P.3d 951 , 954–55 (2003). “[T]he concept of [a] statutory employer ‘[is] designed to prevent an employer from avoiding liability under the workmen’s compensation statutes by sub-contracting the work to others.’ ” Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc., 141 Idaho 245, 251 , 108 P.3d 392, 398 (2005) (quoting Spencer v. Allpress Logging, Inc., 134 Idaho 856, 860 , 11 P.3d 475, 479 (2000)). 2022“The case law surrounding the definition of the term ‘employer’ is what the Court refers to as the statutory employer analysis.” Robison v. Bateman- Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 210–11, 76 P.3d 951 , 954–55 (2003). “[T]he concept of [a] statutory employer ‘[is] designed to prevent an employer from avoiding liability under the workmen’s compensation statutes by sub-contracting the work to others.’ ” Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc., 141 Idaho 245, 251 , 108 P.3d 392, 398 (2005) (quoting Spencer v. Allpress Logging, Inc., 134 Idaho 856, 860 , 11 P.3d 475, 479 (2000)). | 2 | 2 |
Kolar v. Cassia County Idahogreen2 sentences2017Idaho, 142 Idaho 346, 351 , 127 P.3d 962, 967 (2005). 2017Idaho, 142 Idaho 346, 351 , 127 P.3d 962, 967 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.
green
2 sentences2023Smith opposed Excel’s motion, arguing that under the statutory employer analysis from Robison v. Bateman Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 76 P.3d 951 (2003), Amalgamated was not a statutory employer of Excel. 2023Smith opposed Excel’s motion, arguing that under the statutory employer analysis from Robison v. Bateman Hall, Inc., 139 Idaho 207 , 76 P.3d 951 (2003), Amalgamated was not a statutory employer of Excel. | 5 | 2007–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.