Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1992–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ford v. City of Richmondgreen2 sentences1992Reversed and remanded. 1 As an alternative contention, the plaintiffs cite to Henderson v. Central Telephone Co., 233 Va. 377 , 355 S.E.2d 596 (1987), and to Ford v. City of Richmond, 239 Va. 664 , 391 S.E.2d 270 (1990), apparently invoking the statutory-employer rule applied in those cases to a public entity. 1992Reversed and remanded. 1 As an alternative contention, the plaintiffs cite to Henderson v. Central Telephone Co., 233 Va. 377 , 355 S.E.2d 596 (1987), and to Ford v. City of Richmond, 239 Va. 664 , 391 S.E.2d 270 (1990), apparently invoking the statutory-employer rule applied in those cases to a public entity. | 1 | 2 |
Intermodal Services, Inc. v. Smithgreen2 sentences2017The Commission relied on Intermodal Services, Inc. v. Smith, 234 Va. 596, 603 , 364 S.E.2d 221, 225 (1988), to determine that the statutory employer doctrine required the claimant to be an employee of an uninsured subcontractor, not the subcontractor himself. 2017The Commission relied on Intermodal Services, Inc. v. Smith, 234 Va. 596, 603 , 364 S.E.2d 221, 225 (1988), to determine that the statutory employer doctrine required the claimant to be an employee of an uninsured subcontractor, not the subcontractor himself. | 1 | 1 |
Lynch v. Leegreen2 sentences2000Finally, ‘“[t]he construction afforded a statute by the public officials charged with its administration and enforcement is entitled to be given weight by a court.’ ” Lynch v. Lee, 19 Va.App. 230, 232 , 450 S.E.2d 391, 392 (1994) (citation omitted). *821 Here, the legislative, administrative and judicial history of Code § 65.2-600 clearly suggests that the legislature intended, by the amendment, that the potential responsibility of a statutory employer for a claim under the Act, absent timely notice of the related accident, be resolved upon considerations different from those enumerated in Cod 2000Finally, ‘“[t]he construction afforded a statute by the public officials charged with its administration and enforcement is entitled to be given weight by a court.’ ” Lynch v. Lee, 19 Va.App. 230, 232 , 450 S.E.2d 391, 392 (1994) (citation omitted). *821 Here, the legislative, administrative and judicial history of Code § 65.2-600 clearly suggests that the legislature intended, by the amendment, that the potential responsibility of a statutory employer for a claim under the Act, absent timely notice of the related accident, be resolved upon considerations different from those enumerated in Cod | 1 | 1 |
Stiller v. Jefferson Corp.green1 sentence1993See, Stiller v. Jefferson Corp., 10 Va. Cir. 145 (Alexandria 1987) (contractor’s employees performing routine janitorial services for hospital were statutory employees of the hospital). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynolds
green
1 sentence1997The statute was not intended to relieve employers from liability for their own negligence which causes injury to the employees of independent contractors engaged in the performance of work for employers outside the scope of the latter’s occupation.” Basset, supra, at 902 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Holloway v. E. R. Carpenter Co.
neutral
1 sentence1993Moreover, the switch-out of the transformers is not a routine maintenance function akin to routine repairs of the electrical system or production facilities of Rubbermaid as the courts were confronted with in Ferguson and Holloway, supra. The work was not routine maintenance on the plant’s electrical system, which would be analogous to the routine janitorial cleaning services performed by a contractor for the owner which would bring such contractor’s employees within the umbrella of the statutory employer doctrine. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Henderson v. Central Tel. Co. of Virginia
green
2 sentences1992Reversed and remanded. 1 As an alternative contention, the plaintiffs cite to Henderson v. Central Telephone Co., 233 Va. 377 , 355 S.E.2d 596 (1987), and to Ford v. City of Richmond, 239 Va. 664 , 391 S.E.2d 270 (1990), apparently invoking the statutory-employer rule applied in those cases to a public entity. 1992Reversed and remanded. 1 As an alternative contention, the plaintiffs cite to Henderson v. Central Telephone Co., 233 Va. 377 , 355 S.E.2d 596 (1987), and to Ford v. City of Richmond, 239 Va. 664 , 391 S.E.2d 270 (1990), apparently invoking the statutory-employer rule applied in those cases to a public entity. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.