6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jaffee v. Redmondgreen2 sentences2003We believe considering each entry in itself, rather than in the context of a particular claim or a petition as a whole, "is more in tune with the realities of litigation." Jaffee , 142 F.3d at 414. 2003We believe considering each entry in itself, rather than in the context of a particular claim or a petition as a whole, “is more in tune with the realities of litigation.” Jaffee, 142 F.3d at 414. | 2 | 2 |
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Industrial Commissiongreen1 sentence2004See Archer Daniels Midland Co., 91 Ill. 2d at 216 (“where the claimant’s injury was sustained as a result of the condition of the employer’s premises, this court has consistently approved an award of compensation”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois Graphics Co. v. Nickum
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 473 . 2017Nickum, 159 Ill. 2d at 473 . | 3 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.