Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kristiansen v. Morgangreen1 sentence2017The Division of Workers' Compensation "is deemed to have primary jurisdiction to decide compensability issues[.]" Kristiansen v. Morgan, 153 N.J. 298, 313 (1998), modified, 158 N.J. 681 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
General Castings Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review Commissiongreen1 sentence2007See also General Castings Corp., supra, 449 N.W. 2d at 620 (applying Wisconsin's statutory restriction). | 1 | 1 |
Barone v. Harragreen1 sentence1981See Barone v. Harra, supra, 77 N.J. at 279. | 1 | 1 |
Hunt v. Hospital Service Plan of NJgreen2 sentences1977Assuming arguendo that this is a compensable claim, the employer would be responsible for providing medical and surgical treatment: The employer shall furnish to the injured workman such medical, surgical and other treatment, and hospital service as shall be necessary to cure and relieve the workman of the effects of the injury * * *. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-15] In conjunction with that provision we read N.J.S.A. 34:15-15.1: Whenever the expenses of medical, surgical or hospital services, to which the petitioner would be entitled to reimbursement if such petitioner had paid the same as provided in se 1977This reimbursement should not be limited to the payment of medical expenses (as was discussed in Hunt, supra ) but should include the payment of income benefits as well. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kristiansen v. Morgan
green
1 sentence2017The Division of Workers' Compensation "is deemed to have primary jurisdiction to decide compensability issues[.]" Kristiansen v. Morgan, 153 N.J. 298, 313 (1998), modified, 158 N.J. 681 (1999). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.
green
1 sentence2017Petitioner raises the following point on appeal: POINT I THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING THE PETITION ON STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS GROUNDS. [1.] The Workers' Compensation Act is remedial social legislation and should be given liberal construction in order that its beneficent purposes may be accomplished. [2.] Under established legal principles, knowledge of the "nature" of a disability includes knowledge that the injury is compensable. [3.] Uncontradicted testimony establishes that the petitioner did not know he had a compensable claim until 2007 when he filed his claim petiti | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ehteshamfar v. UTA Engineered Systems Div.
green
1 sentence2007Ehteshamfar v. UTA, supra, 555 N.W. 2d at 453 ; Poehlein v. Trans World Airlines, supra, 891 S.W. 2d at 507 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Ventre v. CPC INTERN./CF MUELLER
neutral
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Poehlein v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007Ehteshamfar v. UTA, supra, 555 N.W. 2d at 453 ; Poehlein v. Trans World Airlines, supra, 891 S.W. 2d at 507 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
cluster 511771
green
1 sentence2006We believe that New Jersey would not compensate for slander under these facts. [ Nanavati, supra, 857 F. 2d at 109 ; emphasis added; citation omitted.] We agree with this analysis and find it applicable here. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.
green
2 sentences1999Following the worker's death, his widow filed dependency petitions, which were dismissed by the judge of compensation on the theory that the widow was "collaterally estopped from relitigating decedent's claim which had been dismissed with prejudice because a compensable claim had not been proven." Id. at 95 , 316 A. 2d 478 . 1999Following the worker's death, his widow filed dependency petitions, which were dismissed by the judge of compensation on the theory that the widow was "collaterally estopped from relitigating decedent's claim which had been dismissed with prejudice because a compensable claim had not been proven." Id. at 95 , 316 A. 2d 478 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
MacKo v. Herbert Hinchman & Son
green
1 sentence1953In the very recent case of Macko v. Herbert Hinchman & Son which was decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court on January 8, 1953, 24 N.J. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.