6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reilly v. Dalygreen2 sentences2013We also stated in Reilly that courts have refused to require the traditional formalities of legal proceedings in school 15 suspension and dismissal hearings and that due process requires “not an elaborate hearing before a neutral party, but simply an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian which gives the student an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.” Reilly, 666 N.E.2d at 444 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 2013We also stated in Reilly that courts have refused to require the traditional formalities of legal proceedings in school suspension and dismissal hearings and that due process requires “not an elaborate hearing before a neutral party, but simply an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian which gives the student an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.” Reilly, 666 N.E.2d at 444 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Kolender v. Lawsongreen2 sentences2003Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 (1983). 2003Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lake Central School Corp. v. Scartozzi
green
1 sentence2011Id. (citations omitted). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Raymond J. Gorman, III v. University of Rhode Island
green
1 sentence1996Due process thus requires not an elaborate hearing before a neutral party, but simply ‘“an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian’ which gives the student ‘an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.’” Gorman, 837 F.2d at 16 citing Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 693 , 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1423 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977) (White, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Ingraham v. Wright
green
2 sentences1996Due process thus requires not an elaborate hearing before a neutral party, but simply ‘“an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian’ which gives the student ‘an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.’” Gorman, 837 F.2d at 16 citing Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 693 , 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1423 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977) (White, J., dissenting). 1996Due process thus requires not an elaborate hearing before a neutral party, but simply ‘“an informal give-and-take between student and disciplinarian’ which gives the student ‘an opportunity to explain his version of the facts.’” Gorman, 837 F.2d at 16 citing Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 693 , 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1423 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977) (White, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.