6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kuehne v. United Parcel Service, Inc.green1 sentence2020Kuehne v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 868 N.E.2d 870, 873 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Florian v. GATX RAIL CORP.green1 sentence2011Florian v. Gatx Rail Corp., 930 N.E.2d 1190, 1196 (Ind.Ct.App.2010). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Micronet, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
green
2 sentences2012Id. 2012Id. | 4 | 2010–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.