Homeowners claim in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Chickamauga Properties, Inc. v. Barnardgreen indctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015And there is no dispute that the homeowners continue to use the easement for ingress and egress to their garage. 4 See Chickamauga, 853 N.E.2d at 154-55 (finding no intent to abandon easement where possessor used access road intermittently after complying with landowner’s request to remove dog kennels and conveyed easement to son, the subsequent landowner).	1	1
600 Land, Inc. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion Countygreen ind · 2008 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010Bd. of Zoning Appeals of Marion County, 889 N.E.2d 305, 309 (Ind.2008) (quoting Flying J., Inc. v. City of New Haven Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 855 N.E.2d *1254 1035, 1039 (Ind.Ct.App.2006), reh'g denied, trans. denied ).	1	1
Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculturegreen scotus · 2008 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 1 sentence 2009See Engquist, 128 S.Ct. at 2153-54 ; Richey, 166 So. at 819 ; Parrish, 891 P.2d at 457 ; Armco Steel, 358 N.W.2d at 843-44 .	1	1
Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonvillegreen indctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009Unlike a facial challenge, an as-applied challenge "ask{s] only that the reviewing court declare the challenged statute or regulation unconstitutional on the facts of the particular case." Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, 907 N.E.2d 559, 564 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting Sanjour v. E.P.A., 56 F.3d 85 , 92 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1995)). 2009Unlike a facial challenge, an as-applied challenge "ask{s] only that the reviewing court declare the challenged statute or regulation unconstitutional on the facts of the particular case." Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, 907 N.E.2d 559, 564 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting Sanjour v. E.P.A., 56 F.3d 85 , 92 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1995)).	1	1
Taylor-Chalmers, Inc. v. Board of Commissionersgreen indctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 1 sentence 2006In addressing this contention, we note that the test for the "taking" of property was set forth in Taylor-Chalmers, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 474 N.E.2d 531, 532 (Ind.Ct.App.1985): Some physical part of the real estate must be taken from the owner or lessor, or some substantial right attached to the use of the real estate taken before any basis for compensable damage may be obtained by an owner of real estate in an eminent domain proceeding.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Alva Electric, Inc. v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. green ind · 2014 1 sentence 2016Inc., 7 N.E.3d at 267 .	1	2016–2016
William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection Agency green cadc · 1995 2 sentences 2009Unlike a facial challenge, an as-applied challenge "ask{s] only that the reviewing court declare the challenged statute or regulation unconstitutional on the facts of the particular case." Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, 907 N.E.2d 559, 564 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting Sanjour v. E.P.A., 56 F.3d 85 , 92 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1995)). 2009Unlike a facial challenge, an as-applied challenge "ask{s] only that the reviewing court declare the challenged statute or regulation unconstitutional on the facts of the particular case." Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, 907 N.E.2d 559, 564 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting Sanjour v. E.P.A., 56 F.3d 85 , 92 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1995)).	1	2009–2009
Richey v. Wells green fla · 1936 1 sentence 2009See Engquist, 128 S.Ct. at 2153-54 ; Richey, 166 So. at 819 ; Parrish, 891 P.2d at 457 ; Armco Steel, 358 N.W.2d at 843-44 .	1	2009–2009
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Parrish green kan · 1995 1 sentence 2009See Engquist, 128 S.Ct. at 2153-54 ; Richey, 166 So. at 819 ; Parrish, 891 P.2d at 457 ; Armco Steel, 358 N.W.2d at 843-44 .	1	2009–2009
Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of Treasury green mich · 1984 1 sentence 2009See Engquist, 128 S.Ct. at 2153-54 ; Richey, 166 So. at 819 ; Parrish, 891 P.2d at 457 ; Armco Steel, 358 N.W.2d at 843-44 .	1	2009–2009
West v. Indiana Insurance green ind · 1969 2 sentences 1979West v. Indiana Insurance Co. (1969), 253 Ind. 1, 11 , 247 N.E.2d 90, 97 . 1979West v. Indiana Insurance Co. (1969), 253 Ind. 1, 11 , 247 N.E.2d 90, 97 .	1	1979–1979

Where else courts name it

TX 13 (2003–2025) CA 8 (2008–2025) IN 6 (1979–2016) NC 3 (2010–2021) MD 3 (2010–2018) FL 3 (2004–2024) NM 3 (2000–2018) WA 3 (2005–2012) IL 2 (1982–2021) AL 2 (2010–2012) AZ 2 (1972–2024) NV 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check