6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Phillips v. Officials of City of Valparaisogreen2 sentences1977The standard to be applied here was stated in Phillips v. Officials of City of Valparaiso, (1954) 233 Ind. 414 , 120 N.E.2d 398 , where this Court said: “The question of classification, under the privilege and immunities clause of the Indiana Constitution, Article 1, § 23, is primarily for the legislature and does not become a judicial question unless it clearly appears that the legislative classification is not based on substantial distinctions with reference to the subject-matter, or is manifestly unjust or unreasonable.” (Citation omitted.) 233 Ind. at 421 , 120 N.E.2d at 401 . 1977The standard to be applied here was stated in Phillips v. Officials of City of Valparaiso, (1954) 233 Ind. 414 , 120 N.E.2d 398 , where this Court said: “The question of classification, under the privilege and immunities clause of the Indiana Constitution, Article 1, § 23, is primarily for the legislature and does not become a judicial question unless it clearly appears that the legislative classification is not based on substantial distinctions with reference to the subject-matter, or is manifestly unjust or unreasonable.” (Citation omitted.) 233 Ind. at 421 , 120 N.E.2d at 401 . | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kleiman v. State
green
1 sentence2002The appellant in Kleiman challenged the constitutionality of Indiana Code section 35-38-5-1, arguing “that interpreting the [expungement] statute as distinguishing between a person whose charges are dropped because ‘no offense was committed’ (who may be entitled to expungement) and one who is acquitted after trial[,] violates the privilege and immunities clause of the Indiana constitution.” Kleiman, 590 N.E.2d at 662-63 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Saloom v. Holder
green
2 sentences1976Rennert v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 274 , 329 N.E.2d 595 ; Saloom v. Holder (1973), 158 Ind. App. 177 , 304 N.E.2d 217 (transfer denied). 1976Rennert v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 274 , 329 N.E.2d 595 ; Saloom v. Holder (1973), 158 Ind. App. 177 , 304 N.E.2d 217 (transfer denied). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Rennert v. State
green
2 sentences1976Rennert v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 274 , 329 N.E.2d 595 ; Saloom v. Holder (1973), 158 Ind. App. 177 , 304 N.E.2d 217 (transfer denied). 1976Rennert v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 274 , 329 N.E.2d 595 ; Saloom v. Holder (1973), 158 Ind. App. 177 , 304 N.E.2d 217 (transfer denied). | 1 | 1976–1976 |