6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Northerngreen2 sentences2025In State v. Northern, 304 Kan. 860, 865 , 375 P.3d 363 (2016), Northern argued that counsel's failure to get a signed waiver form under K.A.R. 105-3-9 "would be better evidence of whether the third Ortiz exception applies." 304 Kan. at 865. 2025In State v. Northern, 304 Kan. 860, 865 , 375 P.3d 363 (2016), Northern argued that counsel's failure to get a signed waiver form under K.A.R. 105-3-9 "would be better evidence of whether the third Ortiz exception applies." 304 Kan. at 865. | 1 | 4 |
State v. Harpgreen2 sentences2020See State v. Harp, 283 Kan. 740, 747-48 , 156 P.3d 1268 (2007) (absence of waiver circumstantial evidence defendant had not been informed of right to appeal). 2020See State v. Harp, 283 Kan. 740, 747-48 , 156 P.3d 1268 (2007) (absence of waiver circumstantial evidence defendant had not been informed of right to appeal). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Willingham
green
2 sentences2020State v. Willingham, 266 Kan. 98, 100-01 , 967 P.2d 1079 (1998); see also Northern, 304 Kan. at 865 (finding although trial counsel did not obtain a signed waiver under the regulation, the record demonstrated the defendant was informed of his right to appeal and that he failed to ask his attorney for an appeal). 2020State v. Willingham, 266 Kan. 98, 100-01 , 967 P.2d 1079 (1998); see also Northern, 304 Kan. at 865 (finding although trial counsel did not obtain a signed waiver under the regulation, the record demonstrated the defendant was informed of his right to appeal and that he failed to ask his attorney for an appeal). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Clifton v. Meuser
neutral
2 sentences1939Appellant also calls our attention to Clifton v. Meuser, 79 Kan. 655, 656 , 100 Pac. 645 . 1939Appellant also calls our attention to Clifton v. Meuser, 79 Kan. 655, 656 , 100 Pac. 645 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.