Nelson inquiry (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

Nelson inquiry in Minnesota

6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Tscheugreen
minn · 2008 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See, e.g., State v. Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d 849, 863 (Minn. 2008) (observing that we apply the plain-error analysis to a constitutional challenge or evidentiary question that has been otherwise forfeited by a failure to object).

11
Riley v. Stategreen
minn · 2012 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016“We review a postconviction court’s factual determinations under a clearly errone *858 ous standard, and do not reverse those determinations unless they are not factually supported by the record.” Riley v. State, 819 N.W.2d 162, 167 (Minn.2012).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend Hofstad green
ca8 · 1977
2 sentences

1981In response to Nelson’s inquiry as to whether Tindall thought that Carlson would kill him if he were to testify, Tindall stated that “he did not want to have to find out.” 547 F.2d at 1352-53 . .

1981In response to Nelson's inquiry as to whether Tindall thought that Carlson would kill him if he were to testify, Tindall stated that "he did not want to have to find out." 547 F.2d at 1352-53 . [7] As we observed in note 1, supra, the trial court at the post-trial time of sentencing had information concerning serious threats made by defendant to other persons in unrelated contexts.

21980–1981
State v. Nelson green
minn · 2014
1 sentence

2017In Nelson, the district court denied Nelson’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failing to allege that he had failed to provide both care and support to his children. 842 N.W.2d at 435 .

12017–2017
Nelson v. American Family Insurance Group green
minn · 2002
1 sentence

2014Id.

12014–2014

Where else courts name it

FL 167 (1964–2026) CA 23 (1913–2020) TX 23 (1982–2025) WA 19 (1988–2025) GA 11 (1993–2021) WI 11 (1989–2020) UT 10 (1954–2021) ID 9 (2002–2024) MT 7 (1998–2021) OR 7 (1985–2022) NY 6 (1929–2019) MN 6 (1980–2026) AL 6 (1988–2013) OH 5 (2007–2023) IL 5 (1985–2025) CO 5 (2010–2021) KS 5 (1973–2024) AK 4 (1989–2019) MA 4 (1976–2025) AZ 4 (2000–2017) MS 4 (1993–2026) DC 3 (1993–2007) IN 3 (2006–2017) ND 3 (2000–2005) MO 3 (1993–2024) PA 3 (2005–2024) NE 3 (1992–2023) AR 2 (1996–2014) NV 2 (2006–2017) HI 2 (2004–2014) IA 2 (2017–2021) NJ 2 (2002–2019) VA 2 (1991–2011) NM 2 (1998–2020) TN 2 (2006–2015) MD 2 (1996–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check