Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jsm v. Pjgreen1 sentence2013See J.S.M. v. P.J., 902 So.2d 89 , 91 n. 2 (Ala.Civ.App.2004) (noting that this court had not considered evidence submitted in support of a postjudgment motion when the record did not indicate whether the trial court had considered that evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Dent v. Smithgreen1 sentence1988See Dent v. Smith , 414 So.2d 77 (Ala. 1982); Big B , supra, at 1288. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Greenwood v. Lindsey Harbor, LLC
neutral
1 sentence2010Here, as in Greenwood , we have no Rule 54(b) certificate and we have no judgment presented for review that has finally decided all the rights and liabilities of the various parties; instead, the November 25, 2009, order unquestionably “leaves something else to be done and does not entirely resolve the issues before the court.” 976 So.2d at 1026 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Holman
green
2 sentences2002Like the trial court whose decision to deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea the Supreme Court upheld in State v. Holman, 486 So.2d 500 (Ala.1986), the trial court in this case did not refuse to carry out the plea agreement. 2002Like the trial court whose decision to deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea the Supreme Court upheld in State v. Holman , 486 So.2d 500 (Ala. 1986), the trial court in this case did not refuse to carry out the plea agreement. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Warrior Drilling & Engineering Co. v. King
green
1 sentence1999Novation requires: "(1) a previous valid obligation; (2) an agreement of the parties thereto to a new contract or obligation; (3) an agreement that it is an extinguishment of the old contract or obligation; and (4) the new contract or obligation must be a valid one between the parties thereto." Warrior Drilling Eng'g Co. v. King, 446 So.2d 31 , 33 (Ala. 1984). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Thomas v. Principal Financial Group
green
1 sentence1990Instead, this opinion only recognizes that Nelson presented "evidence of such weight and quality that fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment can reasonably infer the existence of the facts [Nelson] sought to [prove]." Thomas v. Principal Financial Group , 566 So.2d 735 , 738 (Ala. 1990); West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida , 547 So.2d 870 , 871 (Ala. 1989); Ala. Code 1975, § 12-21-12 (d). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida
green
1 sentence1990Instead, this opinion only recognizes that Nelson presented "evidence of such weight and quality that fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment can reasonably infer the existence of the facts [Nelson] sought to [prove]." Thomas v. Principal Financial Group , 566 So.2d 735 , 738 (Ala. 1990); West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida , 547 So.2d 870 , 871 (Ala. 1989); Ala. Code 1975, § 12-21-12 (d). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
In Re Estate of Moore
green
1 sentence1990Brothers, supra. Of course, the fact that Nelson has made out a prima facie case of dominance by Buckley Jr. and Brown does not prevent them from responding at trial to Nelson's claim by disputing her evidence that they had become dominant over Buckley Sr. See Beinlich v. Campbell , 567 So.2d 852 (Ala. 1990). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Beinlich v. Campbell
green
1 sentence1990Brothers, supra. Of course, the fact that Nelson has made out a prima facie case of dominance by Buckley Jr. and Brown does not prevent them from responding at trial to Nelson's claim by disputing her evidence that they had become dominant over Buckley Sr. See Beinlich v. Campbell , 567 So.2d 852 (Ala. 1990). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.