6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McDonoughgreen2 sentences2015See State v. McDonough, 631 N.W.2d 373, 389 (Minn. 2001). 2002State v. McDonough, 631 N.W.2d 373, 389 (Minn.2001). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Rameygreen1 sentence2019See State v. Ramey , 721 N.W.2d 294 , 302 (Minn. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wrengreen1 sentence2017State v. Wren, 738 N.W.2d 378, 393 (Minn. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Yanggreen1 sentence2016State v. Yang, 774 N.W.2d 539, 559 (Minn. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sanders
green
1 sentence2001Sanders, 598 N.W.2d at 656 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.