abrogation rule in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1949–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Russellgreen moctapp · 1994 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997State v. Russell, 872 S.W.2d 866, 868-69 (Mo. App. S.D.1994). 1997State v. Russell, 872 S.W.2d 866, 868-69 (Mo.App.S.D.1994).	2	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Campbell v. Callow green moctapp · 1994 1 sentence 1996Id.	1	1996–1996
Hartman Ex Rel. Hartman v. Hartman green mo · 1991 1 sentence 1994Id. at 858 .	1	1994–1994
Staats v. Co-Operative Transit Co. neutral wva · 1943 1 sentence 1955And-we should have no hesitancy in holding that, even if the common-law-rule that marriage extinguished all rights of action and' claims by one spouse against another, 41 C.J.S., Husband and Wife, § 396, p. 880; Staats v. Co-operative Transit Co., 125 W.Vá. 473, 24 S.E.2d 916 , should be, in the absence of specific statutory provision to the contrary, recognized and applied today in Missouri, Section 451.250 furnishes the necessary specific statutory authority for the abrogation of that rule as it might otherwise apply to the facts of the instant case.	1	1955–1955
Campbell v. Webb green mo · 1947 2 sentences 1949Any statements contained in Campbell v. Webb, 356 Mo. 466 , 202 S. W. (2d) 35 , relied on by defendants, which they understand to indicate [122] an opposite conclusion, are not decisive of the question because that case did not consider the abrogation of the rule. 1949Any statements contained in Campbell v. Webb, 356 Mo. 466 , 202 S. W. (2d) 35 , relied on by defendants, which they understand to indicate [122] an opposite conclusion, are not decisive of the question because that case did not consider the abrogation of the rule.	1	1949–1949

Where else courts name it

PA 14 (1833–2015) TX 13 (1968–2025) MD 12 (1974–2022) NY 12 (1878–2007) CA 12 (1927–2020) SC 9 (1977–1997) AZ 9 (1967–2013) MI 8 (1965–2020) FL 8 (1953–2005) NJ 8 (1958–2008) WI 8 (1911–2013) OH 7 (1973–2008) IN 7 (1963–1997) MO 6 (1949–1997) MA 6 (1980–2006) MN 5 (1919–2017) GA 5 (1915–2017) AL 5 (1930–1989) UT 4 (1993–2014) NC 4 (1955–1982) IL 3 (1914–1983) MT 3 (1900–1945) CT 3 (1935–2005) VA 3 (1997–2025) IA 3 (1964–2010) CO 3 (1987–1996) ID 3 (1975–2026) RI 3 (1989–2002) LA 2 (1998–2006) DC 2 (1979–1979) WY 2 (1975–1989) MS 2 (1992–1994) NH 2 (1985–2006) NM 2 (2023–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check