6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Melbourne Hotel Co. v. Hostettergreen2 sentences2015Id. at 1190-92 . 17 575 (holding TTD benefits are owed until the medical condition has reached the point of “maximum medical progress”). 2015Id. at 1190-92. . | 1 | 3 |
Feltrop v. Missourigreen2 sentences1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. 1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Feltropgreen2 sentences1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. 1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dugger v. Adams
green
2 sentences1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. 1996“To establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211, 1215 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also State v. Feltrop, 803 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1262 , 111 S.Ct. 2918 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1991); Clemmons, 753 S.W.2d at 910-11. | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Goodloe v. Director of Revenue
green
1 sentence1995The State further concedes that Caldwell’s objection to the admission of his driving record was sufficient to preserve the issue of admissibility under Goodloe v. Director of Revenue, 838 S.W.2d 506 (Mo.App.1992). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.