12 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Westgreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn. 1989) ( Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn. 1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn. Crim. 1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn.1989) (Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn.1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988). | 5 | 5 |
Dugger v. Adamsgreen2 sentences2010Therefore, “ ‘[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.’ ” Id. (quoting Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989)). 2010Therefore, “ ‘[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.’ ” Id. (quoting Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989)). | 2 | 5 |
Larry Eugene Mann v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondentgreen2 sentences2010West, 767 S.W.2d at 399 (quoting Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1456 (11th Cir.1988)). 2010West, 767 S.W.2d at 399 (quoting Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1456 (11th Cir.1988)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Taylorgreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn. 1989) ( Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn. 1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn. Crim. 1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn.1989) (Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn.1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988). | 2 | 2 |
Caldwell v. Mississippigreen2 sentences1997The refusal to allow Mr. Nelson to testify under the circumstances in this case constitutes reversible trial error. 42 IMPROPER ARGUMENT Caldwell Violation The defendant claims that the prosecutor's closing argument in the sentencing phase of the trial violated the constitutional principles set forth in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S. Ct. 2633 (1985). 1997The refusal to allow Mr. Nelson to testify under the circumstances in this case constitutes reversible trial error. 42 IMPROPER ARGUMENT Caldwell Violation The defendant claims that the prosecutor's closing argument in the sentencing phase of the trial violated the constitutional principles set forth in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S. Ct. 2633 (1985). | 1 | 4 |
Sawyer v. Smithgreen2 sentences2010Thus, “[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S. Ct. 1211, 1215 (1989); see also Sawyer v. Smith, 497 U.S. 227, 233 , 110 S. Ct. 2822, 2826-2827 (1990). 2010Thus, “[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S. Ct. 1211, 1215 (1989); see also Sawyer v. Smith, 497 U.S. 227, 233 , 110 S. Ct. 2822, 2826-2827 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Romano v. Oklahomagreen2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nicholsgreen2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bigbeered2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Duncangreen2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strouthgreen2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
Norman v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 1 |
Teague v. Stategreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn. 1989) ( Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn. 1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn. Crim. 1994See, e.g., State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 398-399 (Tenn.1989) (Caldwell error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn.1989); Teague v. State, 772 S.W.2d 915, 926 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences1993See Johnson v. State, 797 S.W.2d 578 (Tenn.1990); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn.1989). 1993See Johnson v. State, 797 S.W.2d 578 (Tenn. 1990); State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387, 396 (Tenn. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. United States
green
2 sentences1997State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 399 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). 1997State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 399 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Frank v. United States
green
2 sentences1997State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 399 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). 1997State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 399 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Soule v. Raines
green
2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Strouth v. Tennessee
green
2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Jones v. United States
green
2 sentences2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 2010The statement clearly does not violate Caldwell. 80 See State v. Bigbee, 885 S.W.2d 797, 805 (Tenn. 1994); State v. Duncan, 698 S.W.2d 63, 67-68 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1240 , 89 L.Ed.2d 348 (1986); State v. Strouth, 620 S.W.2d 467, 471 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 1491 , 71 L.Ed.2d 692 (1982); see also State v. Nichols, 877 S.W.2d 722 (Tenn. 1994), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 909 , 130 L.Ed.2d 791 (1995)(supreme court addressed merits of this very issue even though appellant failed to contemporaneously object to the statements). 8 | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Darden v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2010Therefore, “ ‘[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.’ ” Id. (quoting Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989)). 2010Therefore, “ ‘[t]o establish a Caldwell violation, a defendant necessarily must show that the remarks to the jury improperly described the role assigned to the jury by local law.’ ” Id. (quoting Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Lonnie Joe Dutton v. John N. Brown and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae
green
2 sentences1990They expressed their agreement with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593 , which involved federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. 1990They expressed their agreement with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593 , which involved federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.