6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jay v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Id. at 264. ¶ 17. 2011Id. at 264. ¶ 17. | 1 | 2 |
Jefferson v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Jefferson, 95 So.3d at 714 (¶¶ 19-23). | 1 | 1 |
Scaggs v. GPCH-GP, INC.green1 sentence2012See Scaggs v. GPCH-GP, Inc., 931 So.2d 1274, 1275 (¶ 6) (Miss.2006) (reviewing motion to dismiss de novo). | 1 | 1 |
McKay v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2012See generally McKay v. United States, 657 F.3d 1190, 1196 (11th Cir.2011); Delgado v. United States, 475 Fed.Appx. 717, 718-19 (11th Cir.2010) (citing Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998)) (stating that actual innocence means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency). | 1 | 1 |
Roberto Delgado v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2012See generally McKay v. United States, 657 F.3d 1190, 1196 (11th Cir.2011); Delgado v. United States, 475 Fed.Appx. 717, 718-19 (11th Cir.2010) (citing Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998)) (stating that actual innocence means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency). | 1 | 1 |
Carr v. Stategreen1 sentence2008The standard of review for a claim of insufficiency of the evidence is as follows: the critical inquiry is whether the evidence shows "beyond a reasonable doubt that accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction." [ Carr v. State, 208 So.2d 886, 889 (Miss.1968).] However, this inquiry does not require a court to ["]ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.["] Instead | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Johnson v. State, 666 So.2d 784, 794 (Miss. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bousley v. United States
green
2 sentences2012See generally McKay v. United States, 657 F.3d 1190, 1196 (11th Cir.2011); Delgado v. United States, 475 Fed.Appx. 717, 718-19 (11th Cir.2010) (citing Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998)) (stating that actual innocence means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency). 2012See generally McKay v. United States, 657 F.3d 1190, 1196 (11th Cir.2011); Delgado v. United States, 475 Fed.Appx. 717, 718-19 (11th Cir.2010) (citing Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998)) (stating that actual innocence means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.