party assigning error (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

party assigning error in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Bass v. Johnsongreen
ncctapp · 2002 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2002–2004
2 sentences

2004The burden is on the party assigning error to show ‘that the jury was misled or that the verdict was affected by an omitted instruction.’ Bass v. Johnson, 149 N.C.

2002The burden is on the party assigning error to show “that the jury was misled or that the verdict was affected by an omitted instruction.” Bass v. Johnson, 149 N.C.

22
Davis v. Balsergreen
ncctapp · 2002 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2024
2 sentences

2024Id. (citation omitted).

2008The charge will be held to be sufficient if it presents the law of the case in such manner as to leave no reasonable cause to believe the jury was misled or misinformed." Id. at 433 , 574 S.E.2d at 179 (internal quotation marks omitted). "[T]he trial court is not required to give requested instructions verbatim, even when they correctly state the law." State v. Williams, 333 N.C. 719, 731 , 430 S.E.2d 888, 894 (1993).

12
State v. Williamsgreen
· 1993 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008The charge will be held to be sufficient if it presents the law of the case in such manner as to leave no reasonable cause to believe the jury was misled or misinformed." Id. at 433 , 574 S.E.2d at 179 (internal quotation marks omitted). "[T]he trial court is not required to give requested instructions verbatim, even when they correctly state the law." State v. Williams, 333 N.C. 719, 731 , 430 S.E.2d 888, 894 (1993).

2008The charge will be held to be sufficient if it presents the law of the case in such manner as to leave no reasonable cause to believe the jury was misled or misinformed." Id. at 433 , 574 S.E.2d at 179 (internal quotation marks omitted). "[T]he trial court is not required to give requested instructions verbatim, even when they correctly state the law." State v. Williams, 333 N.C. 719, 731 , 430 S.E.2d 888, 894 (1993).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Peoples green
ncctapp · 2004
2 sentences

2016On appeal, "[t]he burden *719 is on the party assigning error to show that the jury was misled or that the verdict was affected by an omitted instruction." State v. Peoples, 167 N.C.App. 63 , 69, 604 S.E.2d 321 , 326 (2004) (citations and quotations omitted).

2016On appeal, "[t]he burden *719 is on the party assigning error to show that the jury was misled or that the verdict was affected by an omitted instruction." State v. Peoples, 167 N.C.App. 63 , 69, 604 S.E.2d 321 , 326 (2004) (citations and quotations omitted).

12016–2016
State v. Ramseur green
ncctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2015"We review a trial court's denial of a request for jury instructions de novo. " State v. Ramseur, --- N.C.App. ----, 739 S.E.2d 599 , 606, appeal dismissed, review and cert. denied, 366 N.C. 599 , 743 S.E.2d 219 (2013). "[A]n instruction to scrutinize the testimony of a witness on the ground of interest or bias is a subordinate feature of the case which does not require the trial judge to give the cautionary instruction unless there is a request for such an instruction. " State v. Dale, 343 N.C. 71 , 77-78, 468 S.E.2d 39 , 43 (1996) (citation and quotations omitted). [On appeal,] [t]he burden

12015–2015
Petrick v. Perritt neutral
nc · 2013
1 sentence

2015"We review a trial court's denial of a request for jury instructions de novo. " State v. Ramseur, --- N.C.App. ----, 739 S.E.2d 599 , 606, appeal dismissed, review and cert. denied, 366 N.C. 599 , 743 S.E.2d 219 (2013). "[A]n instruction to scrutinize the testimony of a witness on the ground of interest or bias is a subordinate feature of the case which does not require the trial judge to give the cautionary instruction unless there is a request for such an instruction. " State v. Dale, 343 N.C. 71 , 77-78, 468 S.E.2d 39 , 43 (1996) (citation and quotations omitted). [On appeal,] [t]he burden

12015–2015
State v. Ramseur neutral
nc · 2013
1 sentence

2015"We review a trial court's denial of a request for jury instructions de novo. " State v. Ramseur, --- N.C.App. ----, 739 S.E.2d 599 , 606, appeal dismissed, review and cert. denied, 366 N.C. 599 , 743 S.E.2d 219 (2013). "[A]n instruction to scrutinize the testimony of a witness on the ground of interest or bias is a subordinate feature of the case which does not require the trial judge to give the cautionary instruction unless there is a request for such an instruction. " State v. Dale, 343 N.C. 71 , 77-78, 468 S.E.2d 39 , 43 (1996) (citation and quotations omitted). [On appeal,] [t]he burden

12015–2015
State v. Dale green
nc · 1996
2 sentences

2015"We review a trial court's denial of a request for jury instructions de novo. " State v. Ramseur, --- N.C.App. ----, 739 S.E.2d 599 , 606, appeal dismissed, review and cert. denied, 366 N.C. 599 , 743 S.E.2d 219 (2013). "[A]n instruction to scrutinize the testimony of a witness on the ground of interest or bias is a subordinate feature of the case which does not require the trial judge to give the cautionary instruction unless there is a request for such an instruction. " State v. Dale, 343 N.C. 71 , 77-78, 468 S.E.2d 39 , 43 (1996) (citation and quotations omitted). [On appeal,] [t]he burden

2015"We review a trial court's denial of a request for jury instructions de novo. " State v. Ramseur, --- N.C.App. ----, 739 S.E.2d 599 , 606, appeal dismissed, review and cert. denied, 366 N.C. 599 , 743 S.E.2d 219 (2013). "[A]n instruction to scrutinize the testimony of a witness on the ground of interest or bias is a subordinate feature of the case which does not require the trial judge to give the cautionary instruction unless there is a request for such an instruction. " State v. Dale, 343 N.C. 71 , 77-78, 468 S.E.2d 39 , 43 (1996) (citation and quotations omitted). [On appeal,] [t]he burden

12015–2015

Where else courts name it

MT 12 (1989–2023) NE 9 (2005–2025) ID 8 (1994–2019) OH 8 (2004–2024) WA 7 (1989–2025) MD 7 (1960–1977) NC 6 (2002–2024) IL 6 (1889–2006) SD 6 (1987–2021) GA 5 (1963–2017) OK 4 (1994–2015) VA 2 (2020–2022) OR 2 (1989–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check