Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. Mayergreen2 sentences2014Tri-State Co. of Minn. v. Bollinger, 476 N.W.2d 697, 700 (S.D.1991); K & E Land and Cattle, *705 Inc. v. Mayer, 330 N.W.2d 529, 533 (S.D.1983). [¶ 22.] Appellants first argue SDCL 15 — 6—25(c) (Rule 25(c)) is inapplicable because Arnoldy’s sheriffs deed is invalid and RCF did not transfer its right to cure the contracts for deed. 1991K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. Mayer, 330 N.W.2d 529, 533 (S.D.1983). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Bittnergreen2 sentences2004"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). 2004“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Dacegreen2 sentences2004"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). 2004“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). | 2 | 2 |
Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Bollingergreen1 sentence2014Tri-State Co. of Minn. v. Bollinger, 476 N.W.2d 697, 700 (S.D.1991); K & E Land and Cattle, *705 Inc. v. Mayer, 330 N.W.2d 529, 533 (S.D.1983). [¶ 22.] Appellants first argue SDCL 15 — 6—25(c) (Rule 25(c)) is inapplicable because Arnoldy’s sheriffs deed is invalid and RCF did not transfer its right to cure the contracts for deed. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Eagle Hawkgreen2 sentences2004"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). 2004“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Larson v. Lockengreen2 sentences2004"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). 2004“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hansengreen2 sentences1990“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Hansen, 407 N.W.2d 217, 219 (S.D.1987). 1990"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Hansen, 407 N.W.2d 217, 219 (S.D.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Douglas v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2021“Prejudicial error is error which in all probability had an effect upon the jury’s verdict and is harmful to the substantial rights of the party assigning the error.” Loen v. Anderson, 2005 S.D. 9 , ¶ 5, 692 N.W.2d 194, 196 . [¶42.] Falkenberg challenges the admissibility of the testimony and certain photographs introduced at trial “showing [Tamara’s] torso with attention focused on areas missing extremities.” In Falkenberg’s view, the evidence was irrelevant because it occurred “post-mortem, days later, and was not related to the cause of [Tamara’s] death” and was unfairly prejudicial. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Matter of MB
green
2 sentences2004"Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error." State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). 2004“Prejudicial error is that which, in all probability, has produced some effect upon the final result and to have affected the rights of the party assigning that error.” State v. Eagle Hawk, 411 N.W.2d 120, 126 (S.D.1987); see also State v. Bittner, 359 N.W.2d 121, 125 ; State v. Dace, 333 N.W.2d 812, 816 (S.D.1983); Matter of M.B., 288 N.W.2d 773 , 776 (S.D.1980); Larson v. Locken, 262 N.W.2d 752, 757 (S.D.1978). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.