6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc.green2 sentences2017In Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc., 102 Nev. 401, 410, 724 P.2d 736, 743 (1986), this court held that "substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where . . . the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced." And we reaffirmed this holding in Fondren v. K I L Complex Ltd., 106 Nev. 705, 710, 800 P.2d 719, 721-22 (1990) ("The failure to serve the pre-lien notice does not invalidate a mechanics' or material 2017In Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc., 102 Nev. 401, 410, 724 P.2d 736, 743 (1986), this court held that "substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where . . . the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced." And we reaffirmed this holding in Fondren v. K I L Complex Ltd., 106 Nev. 705, 710, 800 P.2d 719, 721-22 (1990) ("The failure to serve the pre-lien notice does not invalidate a mechanics' or material | 4 | 5 |
Fondren v. K/L COMPLEX LTD.green2 sentences2017In Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc., 102 Nev. 401, 410, 724 P.2d 736, 743 (1986), this court held that "substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where . . . the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced." And we reaffirmed this holding in Fondren v. K I L Complex Ltd., 106 Nev. 705, 710, 800 P.2d 719, 721-22 (1990) ("The failure to serve the pre-lien notice does not invalidate a mechanics' or material 2017In Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc., 102 Nev. 401, 410, 724 P.2d 736, 743 (1986), this court held that "substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where . . . the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced." And we reaffirmed this holding in Fondren v. K I L Complex Ltd., 106 Nev. 705, 710, 800 P.2d 719, 721-22 (1990) ("The failure to serve the pre-lien notice does not invalidate a mechanics' or material | 2 | 3 |
Hardy Companies, Inc. v. SNMARK, LLCgreen2 sentences2017This principle was reaffirmed in Fondren. 106 Nev. at 709, 800 P.2d at 721 (concluding that substantial compliance with the pre-lien notice requirements occurred because the property owner "had actual knowledge of the construction on her property"); see also Hardy, 126 Nev. at 535, 245 P.3d at 1154 (recognizing that "Fondren is still good law"). 2017This principle was reaffirmed in Fondren. 106 Nev. at 709, 800 P.2d at 721 (concluding that substantial compliance with the pre-lien notice requirements occurred because the property owner "had actual knowledge of the construction on her property"); see also Hardy, 126 Nev. at 535, 245 P.3d at 1154 (recognizing that "Fondren is still good law"). | 2 | 2 |
Las Vegas Plywood & Lumber, Inc. v. D & D Enterprisesgreen2 sentences1986As we noted in Las Vegas Plywood v. D & D Enterprises, 98 Nev. 378 , 649 P.2d 1367 (1982), substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where, as here, the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced. 1986As we noted in Las Vegas Plywood v. D & D Enterprises, 98 Nev. 378 , 649 P.2d 1367 (1982), substantial compliance with the technical requirements of the lien statutes is sufficient to create a lien on the property where, as here, the owner of the property receives actual notice of the potential lien claim and is not prejudiced. | 1 | 2 |
Schofield v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc.green2 sentences2010Failure to either fully or substantially comply with the mechanic’s lien statute will render a mechanic’s lien invalid as a matter of law. *537 Schofield v. Copeland Lumber, 101 Nev. 83, 86 , 692 P.2d 519, 521 (1985). 2010Failure to either fully or substantially comply with the mechanic’s lien statute will render a mechanic’s lien invalid as a matter of law. *537 Schofield v. Copeland Lumber, 101 Nev. 83, 86 , 692 P.2d 519, 521 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.