6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1894–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Goodman v. Myrickgreen1 sentence2006United States v. Doyle, 468 F2d 633, 636 (10th Cir 1972) (canvassing authorities); see Goodman v. Myrick, 5 Or 65, 68 (1873) (“in government surveys, the line actually run upon the ground by the original surveyors is the true line”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harpole v. Paeschke Farms, Inc.
green
1 sentence1977However, it is not necessary for us to explore the boundaries of the rule because all of the material facts relied upon by defendant’s witness were in evidence in this case, as appears from the following discussion.” (Footnote omitted.) 267 Or at 595 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State Highway Commission v. Arnold
green
2 sentences1974This statement of the rule is too broad, as is demonstrated by State Highway Comm. v. Arnold, 218 Or 43 , 341 P2d 1089 , 343 P2d 1113 (1959). ① However, it is not necessary for us to explore the boundaries of the rule because all of the material facts relied upon by defendant’s witness were in evidence in this case, as appears from the following discussion. 1974This statement of the rule is too broad, as is demonstrated by State Highway Comm. v. Arnold, 218 Or 43 , 341 P2d 1089 , 343 P2d 1113 (1959). ① However, it is not necessary for us to explore the boundaries of the rule because all of the material facts relied upon by defendant’s witness were in evidence in this case, as appears from the following discussion. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Hopkins v. Noyes
neutral
1 sentence1936It still remains, however, for the person who asserts claim by adverse possession to have made a mineral discovery and to have performed the annual assessment work, and to have had the boundaries of his claim so marked and indicated as to afford actual notice of the extent and boundaries of his claim and possession, and to have maintained ah actual possession and excluded all adverse claimants for the full period prescribed by the statute, and to have likewise maintained his possession and occupancy during the subsequent period of time in which the adverse locator attempted to initiate his rig | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Loney v. Scott
green
2 sentences1928We think that the question is so well settled as to be no longer open to discussion. *689 In Loney v. Scott, 57 Or. 378 ( 112 Pac. 172 , 32 L. 1928We think that the question is so well settled as to be no longer open to discussion. *689 In Loney v. Scott, 57 Or. 378 ( 112 Pac. 172 , 32 L. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Erhardt v. Boaro
green
1 sentence1894The decisions in the cases of Iron Silver Mining Company v. Elgin Mining Company, 118 U. S. 196 , 6 Sup. Ct. 1177, and Erhardt v. Boaro, 113 U. S. 527 , 5 Sup. Ct. 560, were both made under the law of Colorado, which allows the discoverer a specified time for exploration before marking the boundaries of his claim. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.
green
1 sentence1894The decisions in the cases of Iron Silver Mining Company v. Elgin Mining Company, 118 U. S. 196 , 6 Sup. Ct. 1177, and Erhardt v. Boaro, 113 U. S. 527 , 5 Sup. Ct. 560, were both made under the law of Colorado, which allows the discoverer a specified time for exploration before marking the boundaries of his claim. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.