6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Powellgreen2 sentences2021See Powell, 352 Or at 225-26 . 2019Jackson, 364 Or at 21 ; see also Powell, 352 Or at 225-26 (“It is well established that confessions 106 State v. Vasquez-Santiago are initially deemed to be involuntary and that the state has the burden to overcome that presumption by offering evidence affirmatively establishing that the confession was voluntary.”). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2024We are not persuaded. “[C]onfessions are initially deemed to be involun- tary and * * * the state has the burden to overcome that presumption by offering evidence affirmatively establish- ing that the confession was voluntary,” which the state can prove by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Jackson, 364 Or at 21 . 2024We are not persuaded. “[C]onfessions are initially deemed to be involun- tary and * * * the state has the burden to overcome that presumption by offering evidence affirmatively establish- ing that the confession was voluntary,” which the state can prove by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Jackson, 364 Or at 21 . | 3 | 2019–2024 |
Thomas v. Keeney
green
1 sentence1996Id. at 531 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holman
green
2 sentences1985Although the Oregon Evidence Code applies to all courts, with specified exceptions, OEC 101(1), we do not have occasion here to determine its effect on the prima facie case that we identified in In re Holman, 297 Or 36 , 682 P2d 243 (1984). 1985Although the Oregon Evidence Code applies to all courts, with specified exceptions, OEC 101(1), we do not have occasion here to determine its effect on the prima facie case that we identified in In re Holman, 297 Or 36 , 682 P2d 243 (1984). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.