14 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1973–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Paternity of V.M. v. Mooregreen2 sentences2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion in B.H. to a parent's petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father's petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had 2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion in B.H. to a parent’s petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father’s petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had | 2 | 4 |
In Re Guardianship of ARSgreen2 sentences2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion in B.H. to a parent's petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father's petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had 2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion in B.H. to a parent’s petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father’s petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had | 2 | 2 |
In Re Guardianship of Llgreen2 sentences2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion in B.H. to a parent's petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father's petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had 2007See also In re Guardianship of A.R.S., 816 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (applying the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion in B.H. to a parent’s petition to terminate the guardianship of her children by their grandparents); In re Paternity of V.M., 790 N.E.2d 1005, 1008 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (holding that the grandparents, who had custody of their grandchildren, had the burden to overcome the presumption in favor of the natural father in the father’s petition to modify custody of the children); In re Guardianship of L.L., 745 N.E.2d 222, 231-232 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (holding that the grandmother, who had | 2 | 2 |
Mid-America Mailers, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissionersgreen2 sentences2024(Pet’r Br. at 40.) This Court addresses each in turn, noting as a general principle that “[d]uly promulgated statutes enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality, and the party challenging the constitutionality bears the burden to overcome the presumption.” Mid-America Mailers, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 639 N.E.2d 380, 386 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1994) (citation omitted). 1995The court notes, however, that “[d]uly promulgated statutes enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality, and the party challenging the constitutionality bears the burden to overcome the presumption.” Mid-America Mailers, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs (1994), Ind.Tax, 639 N.E.2d 380, 386 . | 1 | 2 |
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenuegreen1 sentence1996The court notes that the Indiana Gross Income Tax Act, as a series of duly promulgated statutes, “enjoy[s] a strong presumption of constitutionality, and the party challenging the constitutionality bears the burden to overcome the presumption.” Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue, 653 N.E.2d 539, 545 (Ind.Tax 1995). | 1 | 1 |
State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissionersgreen1 sentence1994State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 528 N.E.2d 501, 503 (citing Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 8, 11 , appeal denied, 460 U.S. 1076 , 103 S.Ct. 1761 , 76 L.Ed.2d 338 ). | 1 | 1 |
Conley v. Stategreen2 sentences1973See Conley v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 29 , 284 N.E.2d 803 . 1973See Conley v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 29 , 284 N.E.2d 803 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
green
2 sentences2019Cf. Carter , 298 U.S. at 312 , 56 S.Ct. 855 . 2019Cf. Carter , 298 U.S. at 312 , 56 S.Ct. 855 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Paternity of ZTH
green
1 sentence2009J.I. counters that the facts in this case should be controlled not by B.H., but by In re Paternity of Z.T.H., 839 N.E.2d 246 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trams. not sought. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 308 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 1996Id. at 308 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Burr v. State
green
1 sentence1996Id. at 308 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Bunker v. National Gypsum Co.
green
1 sentence1994State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 528 N.E.2d 501, 503 (citing Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 8, 11 , appeal denied, 460 U.S. 1076 , 103 S.Ct. 1761 , 76 L.Ed.2d 338 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Velilla v. UTC/Hamilton Standard DiVision
green
1 sentence1994State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 528 N.E.2d 501, 503 (citing Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 8, 11 , appeal denied, 460 U.S. 1076 , 103 S.Ct. 1761 , 76 L.Ed.2d 338 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Temple v. Alabama Public Service Commission
green
1 sentence1994State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 528 N.E.2d 501, 503 (citing Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 8, 11 , appeal denied, 460 U.S. 1076 , 103 S.Ct. 1761 , 76 L.Ed.2d 338 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Tolub v. Evans
green
1 sentence1994State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 528 N.E.2d 501, 503 (citing Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 8, 11 , appeal denied, 460 U.S. 1076 , 103 S.Ct. 1761 , 76 L.Ed.2d 338 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Klepinger v. Bd. of Comm. Co. of Miami
green
1 sentence1980State v. Pugh, supra. It is also true that the City can be found liable for damages for personal injury if a relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is found to exist between the municipality and the officer, Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis (1967), 141 Ind.App. 662 , 231 N.E.2d 169 ; Klepinger v. Board of Commissioners of County of Miami (1968), 143 Ind.App. 155 , 239 N.E.2d 160 (overruled on other grounds, Campbell v. State (1971), Ind.App., 269 N.E.2d 765 ); and if the actions of the policeman can be found to breach a duty which was owed to a private individual. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Campbell v. State
green
1 sentence1980State v. Pugh, supra. It is also true that the City can be found liable for damages for personal injury if a relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is found to exist between the municipality and the officer, Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis (1967), 141 Ind.App. 662 , 231 N.E.2d 169 ; Klepinger v. Board of Commissioners of County of Miami (1968), 143 Ind.App. 155 , 239 N.E.2d 160 (overruled on other grounds, Campbell v. State (1971), Ind.App., 269 N.E.2d 765 ); and if the actions of the policeman can be found to breach a duty which was owed to a private individual. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Manson v. Wabash Railroad Company
green
1 sentence1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wirsing v. Krzeminski
green
2 sentences1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. 1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. . Pugh
neutral
2 sentences1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. 1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Klepinger v. Board of Comm.
green
1 sentence1980State v. Pugh, supra. It is also true that the City can be found liable for damages for personal injury if a relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is found to exist between the municipality and the officer, Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis (1967), 141 Ind.App. 662 , 231 N.E.2d 169 ; Klepinger v. Board of Commissioners of County of Miami (1968), 143 Ind.App. 155 , 239 N.E.2d 160 (overruled on other grounds, Campbell v. State (1971), Ind.App., 269 N.E.2d 765 ); and if the actions of the policeman can be found to breach a duty which was owed to a private individual. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis
green
2 sentences1980State v. Pugh, supra. It is also true that the City can be found liable for damages for personal injury if a relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is found to exist between the municipality and the officer, Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis (1967), 141 Ind.App. 662 , 231 N.E.2d 169 ; Klepinger v. Board of Commissioners of County of Miami (1968), 143 Ind.App. 155 , 239 N.E.2d 160 (overruled on other grounds, Campbell v. State (1971), Ind.App., 269 N.E.2d 765 ); and if the actions of the policeman can be found to breach a duty which was owed to a private individual. 1980State v. Pugh, supra. It is also true that the City can be found liable for damages for personal injury if a relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is found to exist between the municipality and the officer, Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis (1967), 141 Ind.App. 662 , 231 N.E.2d 169 ; Klepinger v. Board of Commissioners of County of Miami (1968), 143 Ind.App. 155 , 239 N.E.2d 160 (overruled on other grounds, Campbell v. State (1971), Ind.App., 269 N.E.2d 765 ); and if the actions of the policeman can be found to breach a duty which was owed to a private individual. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bursack v. Davis
green
2 sentences1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. 1980On the contrary, Ervin had the burden to prove the claim made in her complaint that “the killing resulted from the use of unreasonable force by the police officers.” Manson v. Wabash Railroad Co. (1960 Mo.), 338 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Pugh (1888), 101 N.C. 737 , 7 S.E. 757 ; Bursack v. Davis (1929), 199 Wis. 115 , 225 N.W. 738 ; Wirsing v. Krzeminski (1973), 61 Wis.2d 513 , 213 N.W.2d 37 . *60 In fact, Ervin had the burden to overcome a presumption that the police officer acted in good faith. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Haddock v. State
neutral
2 sentences1976These rules have been explicitly reaffirmed by our Supreme Court within this month in Haddock v. State, 260 Ind. 593 , 298 N.E.2d 418 (1973).” There is a presumption that court appointed counsel is competent to represent a defendant and the defendant has the burden to overcome that presumption in a Post Conviction hearing. 1976These rules have been explicitly reaffirmed by our Supreme Court within this month in Haddock v. State, 260 Ind. 593 , 298 N.E.2d 418 (1973).” There is a presumption that court appointed counsel is competent to represent a defendant and the defendant has the burden to overcome that presumption in a Post Conviction hearing. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Schmittler v. State
green
2 sentences1976Shuemak v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 117 , 258 N.E.2d 158 , quoted the following from Schmittler v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 450 , 93 N.E.2d 184 : “ ‘It must be presumed that appellant’s attorney . discharged his full duty and it should require strong and convincing proof to overcome this presumption.’ ” It is our opinion that Cobb failed to overcome the presumption that his court appointed attorney was competent. 1976Shuemak v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 117 , 258 N.E.2d 158 , quoted the following from Schmittler v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 450 , 93 N.E.2d 184 : “ ‘It must be presumed that appellant’s attorney . discharged his full duty and it should require strong and convincing proof to overcome this presumption.’ ” It is our opinion that Cobb failed to overcome the presumption that his court appointed attorney was competent. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Shuemak v. State
green
2 sentences1976Shuemak v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 117 , 258 N.E.2d 158 , quoted the following from Schmittler v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 450 , 93 N.E.2d 184 : “ ‘It must be presumed that appellant’s attorney . discharged his full duty and it should require strong and convincing proof to overcome this presumption.’ ” It is our opinion that Cobb failed to overcome the presumption that his court appointed attorney was competent. 1976Shuemak v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 117 , 258 N.E.2d 158 , quoted the following from Schmittler v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 450 , 93 N.E.2d 184 : “ ‘It must be presumed that appellant’s attorney . discharged his full duty and it should require strong and convincing proof to overcome this presumption.’ ” It is our opinion that Cobb failed to overcome the presumption that his court appointed attorney was competent. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.