6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1968–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Mourygreen1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Moury, 992 A.2d 162, 171 (Pa. Super. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Griffingreen1 sentence2018Commonwealth v. Griffin, 65 A.3d 932, 937 (Pa.Super. 2013) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). ____________________________________________ 5 Given that Appellant’s prior record score (PRS) was RFEL and his conviction of robbery (causing serious bodily injury) carried an offense gravity score (OGS) of 12, the guidelines provided a standard range of 114 to 132 months. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Dodgegreen2 sentences2008Id. at 781 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). ¶ 12 We acknowledge that the sentencing court took account of the guidelines and the factors set forth in § 9721(b). 2008Id. at 781 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). ¶ 12 We acknowledge that the sentencing court took account of the guidelines and the factors set forth in § 9721(b). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Minerdgreen2 sentences2001Brief for Appellant, at 5. 117 With regard to the first issue, our standard of review is well settled. “[A]n appellate court may reverse a trial court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of evidence only upon a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.” Commonwealth v. Minerd, 562 Pa. 46 , 753 A.2d 225, 229 (2000) citing Commonwealth v. Hawk, 551 Pa. 71 , 709 A.2d 373, 376 (1998). 2001Brief for Appellant, at 5. 117 With regard to the first issue, our standard of review is well settled. “[A]n appellate court may reverse a trial court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of evidence only upon a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.” Commonwealth v. Minerd, 562 Pa. 46 , 753 A.2d 225, 229 (2000) citing Commonwealth v. Hawk, 551 Pa. 71 , 709 A.2d 373, 376 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hawkgreen2 sentences2001Brief for Appellant, at 5. 117 With regard to the first issue, our standard of review is well settled. “[A]n appellate court may reverse a trial court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of evidence only upon a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.” Commonwealth v. Minerd, 562 Pa. 46 , 753 A.2d 225, 229 (2000) citing Commonwealth v. Hawk, 551 Pa. 71 , 709 A.2d 373, 376 (1998). 2001Brief for Appellant, at 5. 117 With regard to the first issue, our standard of review is well settled. “[A]n appellate court may reverse a trial court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of evidence only upon a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.” Commonwealth v. Minerd, 562 Pa. 46 , 753 A.2d 225, 229 (2000) citing Commonwealth v. Hawk, 551 Pa. 71 , 709 A.2d 373, 376 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Irizarry v. United States
green
1 sentence2026Irizarry v [U.S.,] 553 U.S. 708 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Firmstone v. Myers
green
2 sentences1968Firmstone v. Myers, 431 Pa. 628 , 246 A. 2d 371 (1968). 1968Firmstone v. Myers, 431 Pa. 628 , 246 A. 2d 371 (1968). | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Commonwealth v. Padgett
green
2 sentences1968The question posed in this case is whether the automatic reversal doctrine is applicable to violation of Bruton rights. 1 The guidelines of inquiry into this question were delineated in Commonwealth v. Padgett, 428 Pa. 229 , 237 A. 2d 209 (1968), and Commonwealth ex rel. 1968The question posed in this case is whether the automatic reversal doctrine is applicable to violation of Bruton rights. 1 The guidelines of inquiry into this question were delineated in Commonwealth v. Padgett, 428 Pa. 229 , 237 A. 2d 209 (1968), and Commonwealth ex rel. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.