Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rose v. Stategreen2 sentences1989Likewise, we reject any suggestion that the parole law instruction declared unconstitutional in Rose, supra, is self-curing, in that it would be inconsistent with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ requirement that we review this case further under the guidelines of rule 81(b)(2). 1989Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529, 554 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (on reh’g). | 2 | 3 |
Roosth v. Roosthgreen2 sentences2007See Roosth, 889 S.W.2d at 450-52 . (holding trial court abused its discretion in limiting parent’s visitation periods with child). 2007See Roosth, 889 S.W.2d at 450 B 52. (holding trial court abused its discretion in limiting parent = s visitation periods with child). | 2 | 2 |
In the INTEREST OF N.P.M., a Childgreen2 sentences2018Id. §§ 153.251(a), 153.252(1), (2); In Interest of N.P.M., 509 S.W.3d at 564 . 2017In re N.P.M., 509 S.W.3d 560, 564 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016, no pet.); see FAM. §§ 153.251(a), 153.252(1), (2). | 1 | 2 |
Howard v. Stategreen1 sentence2020In a guidelines challenge, the inquiry is whether the statute in question “establish[es] minimal guidelines to govern law enforcement.” See Kolender, 461 U.S. at 358 ; Howard v. State, 617 S.W.2d 191, 192 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Stategreen1 sentence2020App. 1979) (concluding loitering ordinance was void on its face when it required law enforcement to determine if a person was “able to give a satisfactory account” of her presence); Baker v. State, 478 S.W.2d 445, 449 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kolender v. Lawson
green
1 sentence2020In a guidelines challenge, the inquiry is whether the statute in question “establish[es] minimal guidelines to govern law enforcement.” See Kolender, 461 U.S. at 358 ; Howard v. State, 617 S.W.2d 191, 192 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Theus v. State
green
1 sentence2000The trial court should have applied the guidelines and factors set out in Theus, 845 S.W.2d at 880-81 , to determine whether the probative value of the prior convictions outweighed their prejudicial effect. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Padgett v. State
green
1 sentence1988In Padgett v. State, 717 S.W.2d 55 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) the court set out the following guidelines to test whether a prosecutor is collaterally estopped. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Almanza v. State
green
2 sentences1985Almanza, supra. We will review his contention according to the guidelines and standard set out in Almanza , supra,that is, whether the error was "so egregious and created such harm that [appellant] `has not had a fair and impartial trial.'" Almanza at p. ___. 1985Almanza, supra. We will review his contention according to the guidelines and standard set out in Almanza, supra, — that is, whether the error was “so egregious and created such harm that [appellant] ‘has not had a fair and impartial trial.’ ” Almanza at p. —. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.