Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. Luddygreen2 sentences2008See id., at 853 . ¶ 11 Michael again appealed and our Supreme Court again granted allocatur “to consider the question of whether the Superior Court properly determined that a negligent supervision claim sounding under Section 317 can never support an award of punitive damages.” Hutchison ex rel. 2006Id. at 845 . ¶ 8 With regard to the jury’s punitive damages award, however, the Hutchison *1264 III panel concluded that: (a) because the only remaining cause of action upon which the jury could properly award damages was negligent supervision pursuant to § 317; and (b) because punitive damages cannot be awarded for misconduct that constitutes only ordinary negligence; therefore, (c) a negligent supervision claim cannot support a claim for punitive damages. | 2 | 3 |
Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. Luddygreen2 sentences2006Hutchison III, 763 A.2d at 837 , citing Mullen v. Topper’s Salon and Health Spa, Inc., 99 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa.2000). 3 ¶ 9 Once again, our supreme court granted allocatur limited to the narrow issue whether this court “properly determined that a negligent supervision claim sounding under § 317 can never support an award of punitive damages.” Hutchison v. Luddy, 582 Pa. 114, 120 , 870 A.2d 766, 769 (2005) (“Hutchison IV”). 2006Hutchison III, 763 A.2d at 837 , citing Mullen v. Topper’s Salon and Health Spa, Inc., 99 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa.2000). 3 ¶ 9 Once again, our supreme court granted allocatur limited to the narrow issue whether this court “properly determined that a negligent supervision claim sounding under § 317 can never support an award of punitive damages.” Hutchison v. Luddy, 582 Pa. 114, 120 , 870 A.2d 766, 769 (2005) (“Hutchison IV”). | 2 | 2 |
Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, Inc.green2 sentences2000As the federal district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has recognized in a recently published opinion, a negligent supervision claim based on section 317 and based on Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, 431 Pa. 562 , 246 A.2d 418 (1968), does not support a claim for punitive damages. 2000As the federal district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has recognized in a recently published opinion, a negligent supervision claim based on section 317 and based on Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, 431 Pa. 562 , 246 A.2d 418 (1968), does not support a claim for punitive damages. | 1 | 2 |
Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.green2 sentences2005Phillips v. A-Best Products Co., 542 Pa. 124, 665 A.2d 1167, 1170 (1995). 2005Phillips v. A-Best Products Co., 542 Pa. 124, 665 A.2d 1167, 1170 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mullen v. Topper's Salon and Health Spa, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Hutchison III, 763 A.2d at 837 , citing Mullen v. Topper’s Salon and Health Spa, Inc., 99 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa.2000). 3 ¶ 9 Once again, our supreme court granted allocatur limited to the narrow issue whether this court “properly determined that a negligent supervision claim sounding under § 317 can never support an award of punitive damages.” Hutchison v. Luddy, 582 Pa. 114, 120 , 870 A.2d 766, 769 (2005) (“Hutchison IV”). 2006Hutchison III, 763 A.2d at 837 , citing Mullen v. Topper’s Salon and Health Spa, Inc., 99 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa.2000). 3 ¶ 9 Once again, our supreme court granted allocatur limited to the narrow issue whether this court “properly determined that a negligent supervision claim sounding under § 317 can never support an award of punitive damages.” Hutchison v. Luddy, 582 Pa. 114, 120 , 870 A.2d 766, 769 (2005) (“Hutchison IV”). | 2 | 2000–2006 |
Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.
green
1 sentence2016Partners, 708 F.3d 470 , 487–88 (3rd Cir. 2013) (citing Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, Inc., 431 Pa. 562, 565 , 246 A.2d 418, 420 (1968)). - 10 - J-A12044-16 Likewise, Appellant’s poorly pled complaint does not set forth sufficient facts to support a claim of negligent supervision against LVFPA. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Davies v. Barnes
green
2 sentences2001In a similar case, Davies v. Barnes, 94 Pa. Commw. 145 , 503 A.2d 93 (1986), the Commonwealth Court also rejected a negligent supervision claim against a vocational school on the ground of governmental immunity. 2001In a similar case, Davies v. Barnes, 94 Pa. Commw. 145 , 503 A.2d 93 (1986), the Commonwealth Court also rejected a negligent supervision claim against a vocational school on the ground of governmental immunity. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.