6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Torrencegreen2 sentences2016State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45 , 406 S.E.2d 315 (1991). 2016State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45 , 406 S.E.2d 315 (1991). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCall v. Batson
red
2 sentences1990DISCUSSION A. The Effective Date of the Tort Claims Act In McCall v. Batson, 285 S.C. 243 , 329 S.E. (2d) 741 (1985), this Court abolished the doctrine of sovereign immunity in South Carolina with certain limitations. 1990DISCUSSION A. The Effective Date of the Tort Claims Act In McCall v. Batson, 285 S.C. 243 , 329 S.E. (2d) 741 (1985), this Court abolished the doctrine of sovereign immunity in South Carolina with certain limitations. | 2 | 1987–1990 |
Walton v. Stewart
neutral
1 sentence1984Nearly two years later, in Walton v. Stewart, 277 S. C. 436, 289 S. E. (2d) 403 (1982), the Supreme Court held that its abrogation of the parental immunity doctrine applied prospectively only and that the doctrine therefore barred the maintenance of an action based on an event occurring before the Court abolished the doctrine. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.