appellant establishes prima facie error in Indiana

2015When an appellee fails to submit a brief, we do not undertake the burden of developing its arguments, and we apply a less stringent standard of review, that is, we may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error.' Zoller v. Zoller, 858 N.E.2d 124, 126 (Ind.Ct.App.2006).

2013Therefore, “we may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is an error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2026“Prima facie” is defined as “at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Deckard v. Deckard, 841 N.E.2d 194, 199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (citations omitted). [6] The court entered its order garnishing Gonzalez’s wages following Plaza’s motions for a proceeding supplemental to execution.

2019We may, therefore, reverse the trial court if the appellant establishes prima facie error. " Prima facie " is defined as "at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it." Deckard v. Deckard , 841 N.E.2d 194 , 199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (citations omitted). [9] The State contends that the trial court misinterpreted Indiana Code Section 32-18-2-18 (2018) of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ("the Act") when it ordered that Larry would receive $7,500 of the proceeds from the sale of the property "for his equitable interest in the property." Appellant's App. Vol. 2 at 118.

2013Aiken v. Stanley, 816 N.E.2d 427, 430 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).

2012Aiken v. Stanley, 816 N.E.2d 427, 430 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).

2015We will reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which means error “‘at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.’” Id. (quoting Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang, 848 N.E.2d 1065, 1068 (Ind. 2006)).

2015We will reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which means error “ ‘at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.’ ” Id. (quoting Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang, 848 N.E.2d 1065, 1068 (Ind.2006)).

2020“When the appellee does not file a brief, we apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse the trial court when the appellant establishes prima facie error.” Geller v. Kinney, 980 N.E.2d 390, 398 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “‘Prima facie’ is defined as ‘at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id. (citing Parkhurst v. Van Winkle, 786 N.E.2d 1159, 1160 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003)).

2017Id. “‘Prima facie’ is defined as ‘at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.’” Id. (quoting Parkhurst v. Van Winkle, 786 N.E.2d 1159, 1160 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003)). [13] Mother argues that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying custody.

2020Standard of Review [19] Father has not filed an appellee’s brief in this appeal. “[W]e do not undertake the burden of developing appellee’s arguments, and we apply a less stringent standard of review, that is, we may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error.” Meisberger v. Bishop, 15 N.E.3d 653, 656 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). 3 The appealed order was not included in the Appellant’s Appendix.

2017“When an appellee fails to submit a brief, we do not undertake the burden of developing appellee’s arguments, and we apply a less stringent standard of review, that is, we may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error.” Meisberger v. Bishop, 15 N.E.3d 653, 656 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).

2013In re Paternity of B.N.C., 822 N.E.2d 616, 618-19 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).

2013In re Paternity of B.N.C., 822 N.E.2d 616, 618-19 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).

2020Id.

2020Id.

2023Id. at 351-52 .

2018“We may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id. at 351–52.

2025“When an appellee fails to submit a brief, we apply a less stringent standard of review with respect to the showing necessary to establish reversible error.” In re Paternity of S.C., Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-GU-1997 | May 15, 2025 Page 8 of 15 966 N.E.2d 143, 148 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), trans. denied. “[W]e may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is an error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2025“When an appellee fails to submit a brief, we apply a less stringent standard of review with respect to the showing necessary to establish reversible error.” In re Paternity of S.C., Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-GU-1997 | May 15, 2025 Page 8 of 15 966 N.E.2d 143, 148 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), trans. denied. “[W]e may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is an error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2009Butrum v. Roman, 803 N.E.2d 1139, 1142 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), trans. denied.

2009Butrum v. Roman, 803 N.E.2d 1139, 1142 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), trans. denied.

2013State v. C.D., 947 N.E.2d 1018, 1021 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).

2013We may reverse the trial court’s decision if the appellant establishes prima facie error — that is, error "at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it." Id. (citation omitted).

2011State v. Combs, 921 N.E.2d 846, 850 (Ind.Ct.App.2010).

2011Id.

2009Damon Corp. v. Estes, 750 N.E.2d 891, 893 (Ind. Ct.App.2001).

2009Damon Corp. v. Estes, 750 N.E.2d 891, 893 (Ind.Ct.App.2001).

2010Id.

2001In addition, we apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse the trial court when the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is defined as error “at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id. 2 .

2019We apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, namely “error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2019Instead, we apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, namely "error at first sight, on first appearance or on the face of it." Id. ( quoting *82 Van Wieren v. Van Wieren , 858 N.E.2d 216 , 221 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) ).

2014Laflamme v. Goodwin, 911 N.E.2d 660, 664 (Ind.Ct.App.2009). “[W]e may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is an error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2014Laflamme v. Goodwin, 911 N.E.2d 660, 664 (Ind.Ct.App.2009). “[W]e may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, which is an error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Id.

2019Instead, we apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, namely "error at first sight, on first appearance or on the face of it." Id. ( quoting *82 Van Wieren v. Van Wieren , 858 N.E.2d 216 , 221 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) ).

2019Instead, we apply a less stringent standard of review and may reverse if the appellant establishes prima facie error, namely “error at first sight, on first appearance or on the face of it.” Id. (quoting Van Wieren v. Van Wieren, 858 N.E.2d 216, 221 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006)).