6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jordan v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial Districtgreen2 sentences2004See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann . § 161.032(a); Jordan v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 701 S.W.2d 644, 648 (Tex. 1985) ( holding that medical committee privilege “extends to documents that have been prepared by or at the direction of the committee for committee purposes”); In re WHMC , 996 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (“[I]nformation is protected by the hospital committee privilege if sought out by or brought to the attention of the committee for purposes of an investigation, review, or other deliberative proceeding.”). 2004See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 161.032 (a); Jordan v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 701 S.W.2d 644, 648 (Tex.1985) (holding that medical committee privilege “extends to documents that have been prepared by or at the direction of the committee for committee purposes”); In re WHMC, 996 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (“[Ijnformation is protected by the hospital committee privilege if sought out by or brought to the attention of the committee for purposes of an investigation, review, or other deliberative proceeding.”). | 5 | 5 |
In Re WHMCgreen2 sentences2004See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann . § 161.032(a); Jordan v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 701 S.W.2d 644, 648 (Tex. 1985) ( holding that medical committee privilege “extends to documents that have been prepared by or at the direction of the committee for committee purposes”); In re WHMC , 996 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (“[I]nformation is protected by the hospital committee privilege if sought out by or brought to the attention of the committee for purposes of an investigation, review, or other deliberative proceeding.”). 2004See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 161.032 (a); Jordan v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 701 S.W.2d 644, 648 (Tex.1985) (holding that medical committee privilege “extends to documents that have been prepared by or at the direction of the committee for committee purposes”); In re WHMC, 996 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (“[Ijnformation is protected by the hospital committee privilege if sought out by or brought to the attention of the committee for purposes of an investigation, review, or other deliberative proceeding.”). | 3 | 3 |
Barnes v. Whittingtongreen2 sentences1999See Barnes, 751 S.W.2d at 496 . 1999The hospital committee privilege also does not apply to “records made or maintained in the regular course of business by a hospital.” Id. at § 161.032(c). | 2 | 2 |
Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1999Such records include those “kept in connection with the treatment of individual patients as well as the business and administrative files and papers apart from committee deliberations.” Texarkana Mem’l, 551 S.W.2d at 35 . 1990Texarkana Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Jones, 551 S.W.2d 33, 35 (Tex.1977). | 1 | 2 |
Fuentes v. Stategreen1 sentence1990See Fuentes v. State, 775 S.W.2d 64, 65-66 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no pet.) (wife's prior testimony, over her objection and without being informed of privilege, did not waive her privilege not to testify against her husband); see also Tex.R.Civ.Evid. 512 (privilege is not defeated by disclosure which is compelled erroneously or made without opportunity to claim privilege). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1999Such records include those “kept in connection with the treatment of individual patients as well as the business and administrative files and papers apart from committee deliberations.” Texarkana Mem’l, 551 S.W.2d at 35 . 1990Texarkana Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Jones, 551 S.W.2d 33, 35 (Tex.1977). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terrell State Hospital of the Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Ashworth
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hoffman
green
2 sentences1990Terrell cites National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Hoffman, 746 S.W.2d 305 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1988, orig. proceeding), in support of its argument that Gilbert's conduct did not waive the hospital committee privilege as to the psychological autopsy. 1990Terrell cites National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Hoffman, 746 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988, orig. proceeding), in support of its argument that Gilbert’s conduct did not waive the hospital committee privilege as to the psychological autopsy. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.