6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lane v. Stategreen2 sentences2026Indeed, while a victim’s injuries are factors in determining whether an object qualifies as a deadly weapon, Lane v. State, 151 S.W.3d 188, 191 (Tex. Crim. 2024Indeed, while a victim’s injuries are factors in determining whether an object qualifies as a deadly weapon, Lane v. State, 151 S.W.3d 188, 191 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Moore v. Stategreen1 sentence2024App. 2004), the State is not required to show that an object actually caused serious bodily injury to prove that it was used as a deadly weapon, Moore v. State, 520 S.W.3d 906, 908 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Creel v. Browngreen1 sentence2022See Biaggi, 149 S.W.3d at 305–06. 12 In Alabama, “[c]ontributory negligence on the part of a plaintiff [that] proximately contributes to the plaintiff’s injuries will bar recovery.” Creel v. Brown, 508 So. 2d 684 , 687–88 (Ala. 1987); see also Hawkins v. Simmons, 295 So. 3d 683 , 688 (Ala. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Biaggi v. Patrizio Restaurant Inc.green1 sentence2022See Biaggi, 149 S.W.3d at 305–06. 12 In Alabama, “[c]ontributory negligence on the part of a plaintiff [that] proximately contributes to the plaintiff’s injuries will bar recovery.” Creel v. Brown, 508 So. 2d 684 , 687–88 (Ala. 1987); see also Hawkins v. Simmons, 295 So. 3d 683 , 688 (Ala. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006Said another way, the determination whether the Dyers have a concrete injury for which the City is liable does not depend on “contingent or hypothetical facts, or upon events that have not yet come to pass.” Id. at 443 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Moore
green
2 sentences1938Ass’n v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 46 S.W.2d 404 ; Id., 123 Tex. 302 , 70 S.W.2d 702 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. 1938Ass’n v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 46 S.W.2d 404 ; Id., 123 Tex. 302 , 70 S.W.2d 702 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Texas Employers Insurance v. Moore
neutral
2 sentences1938Ass’n v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 46 S.W.2d 404 ; Id., 123 Tex. 302 , 70 S.W.2d 702 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. 1938Ass’n v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 46 S.W.2d 404 ; Id., 123 Tex. 302 , 70 S.W.2d 702 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Parry
green
1 sentence1931App.) 12 S.W.(2d) 997 . ' [6, 7] The rule with reference to the admission of demonstrative evidence in personal injury suits is that where a party complains of injuries to the foot, hand, ear, or other member, it is within the sound discretion of the trial court to permit the jury to inspect the injuries and this rule is extended to include cases of hernia. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.