6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Coppolagreen2 sentences2024See In re Coppola, 535 S.W.3d 506, 510 (Tex. 2017) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). –3– Accordingly, we deny relator’s amended petition. 2021See In re Coppola, 535 S.W.3d 506, 50 (Tex. 2017) (orig. proceeding) (due to extraordinary nature of remedy, mandamus relief generally requires predicate request for action by respondent, and respondent’s erroneous refusal to act). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Perrittgreen2 sentences2021See In re Perritt, 992 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding) -8- 04-20-00390-CV (recognizing the predicate-request requirement may be relaxed on “rare occasions” when a request and refusal would have been futile). 2021See In re Perritt, 992 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding) -8- 04-20-00390-CV (recognizing the predicate-request requirement may be relaxed on “rare occasions” when a request and refusal would have been futile). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||