6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wainwright v. Wittgreen2 sentences2006See Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S. Ct. 844 , 83 L. 2006See Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S. Ct. 844 , 83 L. | 4 | 4 |
Adams v. Texasgreen2 sentences2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neder v. United States
green
2 sentences2004Cf. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 ; Clark, 143 Wn.2d at 776-77 . 2004Cf. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 ; Clark, 143 Wash.2d at 776-77 , 24 P.3d 1006 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Clark
green
2 sentences2004Cf. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 ; Clark, 143 Wn.2d at 776-77 . 2004Cf. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 ; Clark, 143 Wash.2d at 776-77 , 24 P.3d 1006 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Davis
green
1 sentence2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Davis
green
1 sentence2006Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 593 , 940 P.2d 546 ; see also Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). ś 80 Death qualification is the process whereby the trial court may dismiss prospective jurors for cause if the juror's philosophical views against the death penalty would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)); State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798, 856-57 , 10 P.3 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Clark
green
1 sentence2004Cf. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 ; Clark, 143 Wash.2d at 776-77 , 24 P.3d 1006 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.