deny defense in Alabama

1984"Where jurors testify that they have an opinion, but that they will try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and evidence and that their opinion will not influence their verdict, they are competent to serve as jurors, and it is not error for the trial court to deny challenge for cause." Godau v. State , 179 Ala. 27 , 60 So. 908 (1913); McCorvey v. State , 339 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 339 So.2d 1058 (Ala. 1976); Jarrell v. State , 355 So.2d 747 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

1984"Where jurors testify that they have an opinion, but that they will try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and evidence and that their opinion will not influence their verdict, they are competent to serve as jurors, and it is not error for the trial court to deny challenge for cause." Godau v. State , 179 Ala. 27 , 60 So. 908 (1913); McCorvey v. State , 339 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 339 So.2d 1058 (Ala. 1976); Jarrell v. State , 355 So.2d 747 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

1984"Where jurors testify that they have an opinion, but that they will try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and evidence and that their opinion will not influence their verdict, they are competent to serve as jurors, and it is not error for the trial court to deny challenge for cause." Godau v. State , 179 Ala. 27 , 60 So. 908 (1913); McCorvey v. State , 339 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 339 So.2d 1058 (Ala. 1976); Jarrell v. State , 355 So.2d 747 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

1984"Where jurors testify that they have an opinion, but that they will try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and evidence and that their opinion will not influence their verdict, they are competent to serve as jurors, and it is not error for the trial court to deny challenge for cause." Godau v. State , 179 Ala. 27 , 60 So. 908 (1913); McCorvey v. State , 339 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 339 So.2d 1058 (Ala. 1976); Jarrell v. State , 355 So.2d 747 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

1984"Where jurors testify that they have an opinion, but that they will try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and evidence and that their opinion will not influence their verdict, they are competent to serve as jurors, and it is not error for the trial court to deny challenge for cause." Godau v. State , 179 Ala. 27 , 60 So. 908 (1913); McCorvey v. State , 339 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 339 So.2d 1058 (Ala. 1976); Jarrell v. State , 355 So.2d 747 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

1974It is the right of the accused to controvert evidence in laying such predicate by cross-examination, or by evidence aliunde, but such countervailing evidence impeaching the predicate to be successful must be offered on the voir dire, before the confession is admitted.” Further, we have held it to be reversible error for the trial court to deny defendant counsel the right to cross-examine the witness on voir dire with reference to the circumstances of the confession, viz.: “ * * * And it has been held reversible error for the trial court to deny defense counsel opportunity to cross-examine the

1974It is the right of the accused to controvert evidence in laying such predicate by cross-examination, or by evidence aliunde, but such countervailing evidence impeaching the predicate to be successful must be offered on the voir dire, before the confession is admitted.” Further, we have held it to be reversible error for the trial court to deny defendant counsel the right to cross-examine the witness on voir dire with reference to the circumstances of the confession, viz.: “ * * * And it has been held reversible error for the trial court to deny defense counsel opportunity to cross-examine the

1969Theile v. State, 44 Ala. App. 375 , 209 So.2d 854 , and cases there cited.

1969Theile v. State, 44 Ala. App. 375 , 209 So.2d 854 , and cases there cited.

1968Young v. State, 41 Ala. App. 284 , 130 So.2d 249 ; Vernon v. State, 239 Ala. 593 , 196 So. 96, 100 .

1968Young v. State, 41 Ala. App. 284 , 130 So.2d 249 ; Vernon v. State, 239 Ala. 593 , 196 So. 96, 100 .

1968Young v. State, 41 Ala. App. 284 , 130 So.2d 249 ; Vernon v. State, 239 Ala. 593 , 196 So. 96, 100 .

1968Young v. State, 41 Ala. App. 284 , 130 So.2d 249 ; Vernon v. State, 239 Ala. 593 , 196 So. 96, 100 .

1839Southwick et al. ( 2 Porter, 351 ,) which was a bill filed by the creditors of a firm, against the executrix of a deceased partner, to subject the assets of the estate in her hands, to.the payment of a partnership debt, the court deny the principle now asserted by the defendants in error, and limit the construction of this section of the statute to its letter.