5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1922–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burrill v. Nair CA3green2 sentences2017An important reason for this position has been to prevent implementation of a scheme to file a complaint for the purpose of establishing a privilege to publicize its content and then dropping the action.’ ” (Burrill, supra, 217 Cal.App.4th at p. 397 , quoting Rest.2d Torts, § 611, com. e, p. 300.)9 Here, plaintiffs rely on this quote in Burrill to support their argument that there must be some judicial action on a complaint before a report about the complaint is privileged. 2016An important reason for this position has been to prevent implementation of a scheme to file a complaint for the purpose of establishing a privilege to publicize its content and then dropping the action.’ ” (Burrill, supra, 217 Cal.App.4th at p. 397 , quoting Rest.2d Torts, § 611, com. e, p. 300.) 9 Here, plaintiffs rely on this quote in Burrill to support their argument that there must be some judicial action on a complaint before a report about the complaint is privileged. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sinz v. Owens
green
2 sentences1974Haas, supra, 45 Cal.2d 811, 833 .) In Sinz v. Owens, 33 Cal.2d 749 [ 205 P.2d 3 , 8 A.L.R.2d 757 ], the plaintiff sustained a double comminuted fracture of the tibia and fibula of his left leg as a result of a traffic accident and was treated by a Lodi physician; the defendant-doctor took X-rays; the first X-ray showed good bone alignment so defendant applied a plaster cast; subsequent X-rays revealed an increasing angulation of bone in the upper and lower fractures; plaintiff called a Stockton physician (Stockton and Lodi are adjoining communities) for the purpose of establishing the standard 1974Haas, supra, 45 Cal.2d 811, 833 .) In Sinz v. Owens, 33 Cal.2d 749 [ 205 P.2d 3 , 8 A.L.R.2d 757 ], the plaintiff sustained a double comminuted fracture of the tibia and fibula of his left leg as a result of a traffic accident and was treated by a Lodi physician; the defendant-doctor took X-rays; the first X-ray showed good bone alignment so defendant applied a plaster cast; subsequent X-rays revealed an increasing angulation of bone in the upper and lower fractures; plaintiff called a Stockton physician (Stockton and Lodi are adjoining communities) for the purpose of establishing the standard | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Seneris v. Haas
green
1 sentence1974Haas, supra, 45 Cal.2d 811, 833 .) In Sinz v. Owens, 33 Cal.2d 749 [ 205 P.2d 3 , 8 A.L.R.2d 757 ], the plaintiff sustained a double comminuted fracture of the tibia and fibula of his left leg as a result of a traffic accident and was treated by a Lodi physician; the defendant-doctor took X-rays; the first X-ray showed good bone alignment so defendant applied a plaster cast; subsequent X-rays revealed an increasing angulation of bone in the upper and lower fractures; plaintiff called a Stockton physician (Stockton and Lodi are adjoining communities) for the purpose of establishing the standard | 1 | 1974–1974 |
People v. Smith
green
1 sentence1922The case of People v. Smith, 63 Cal. Dec. 637 [ 207 Pac. 518 ], is cited as holding that such an instruction is erroneous. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.