5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alpersongreen2 sentences2007(Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson (1979) 25 Cal.3d 124, 129 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 599 P.2d 83 ].) However, all fees falling within the provision are recoverable, even if the activities on which the fees are predicated also supported the prosecution or defense of claims outside the provision. 2007(Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson (1979) 25 Cal.3d 124, 129 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 599 P.2d 83 ].) However, all fees falling within the provision are recoverable, even if the activities on which the fees are predicated also supported the prosecution or defense of claims outside the provision. | 1 | 1 |
Rudnick v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1988When the patient himself discloses those ailments by bringing an action in which they are in issue, there is no longer any reason for the privilege." ( City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court (1951) 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ]; Rudnick v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 924, 933, fn. 13 [ 114 Cal. Rptr. 603 , 523 P.2d 643 ].) (7b) In the present case, the record before us establishes that 89 of the participants in the study are also plaintiffs in the suit against the facility. 1988When the patient himself discloses those ailments by bringing an action in which they are in issue, there is no longer any reason for the privilege." ( City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court (1951) 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ]; Rudnick v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 924, 933, fn. 13 [ 114 Cal. Rptr. 603 , 523 P.2d 643 ].) (7b) In the present case, the record before us establishes that 89 of the participants in the study are also plaintiffs in the suit against the facility. | 1 | 1 |
City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1988When the patient himself discloses those ailments by bringing an action in which they are in issue, there is no longer any reason for the privilege." ( City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court (1951) 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ]; Rudnick v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 924, 933, fn. 13 [ 114 Cal. Rptr. 603 , 523 P.2d 643 ].) (7b) In the present case, the record before us establishes that 89 of the participants in the study are also plaintiffs in the suit against the facility. 1988When the patient himself discloses those ailments by bringing an action in which they are in issue, there is no longer any reason for the privilege." ( City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court (1951) 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ]; Rudnick v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 924, 933, fn. 13 [ 114 Cal. Rptr. 603 , 523 P.2d 643 ].) (7b) In the present case, the record before us establishes that 89 of the participants in the study are also plaintiffs in the suit against the facility. | 1 | 1 |
System Investment Corp. v. Union Bankgreen2 sentences1979Corp. v. Union Bank, 21 Cal.App.3d 137, 162 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 735 ]). 1979Corp. v. Union Bank, 21 Cal.App.3d 137, 162 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 735 ]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Keyes v. Bowen
green
1 sentence2015Although this amount was higher than the $157,000 value agreed upon by the parties at the beginning of the May 21 hearing, the increased valuation benefitted Barbara, and Robert does not challenge it on appeal. 4 DISCUSSION A trial court order is presumed to be correct, and “to be successful on appeal, an appellant must be able to affirmatively demonstrate error on the record before the court.” (In re Marriage of Falcone and Fyke (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 814, 822 .) Moreover, “the appellant has the burden to prove [error] by presenting legal authority on each point made and factual analysis, sup | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke
green
1 sentence2015Although this amount was higher than the $157,000 value agreed upon by the parties at the beginning of the May 21 hearing, the increased valuation benefitted Barbara, and Robert does not challenge it on appeal. 4 DISCUSSION A trial court order is presumed to be correct, and “to be successful on appeal, an appellant must be able to affirmatively demonstrate error on the record before the court.” (In re Marriage of Falcone and Fyke (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 814, 822 .) Moreover, “the appellant has the burden to prove [error] by presenting legal authority on each point made and factual analysis, sup | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Gerrold v. Penn Title Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2009Co., supra, 637 A.2d at p. 1296 .) That Access may not be able to recover its losses and litigation defense costs from CHL 9 does not permit the pursuit of a claim against First American for losses that are not covered by its policies. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.